The finite-thrust deployment of a two-satellite formation into a highly elliptic orbit is optimized by means of an indirect approach, which is based on the theory of optimal control. Earth oblateness and gravitational perturbations from Moon and Sun are considered. The optimization procedure provides the engine switching times and the thrust direction during each burn in order to transfer the satellites to the same prescribed final orbit with assigned distance between them at the apogee passage; the total final mass is maximized. A minimum-distance constraint is introduced when required to avoid collision risk. Different deployment strategies are analyzed; in particular, the classical chaser-target approach is compared to cooperative deployment. Necessary conditions for optimality are derived and numerical results presented. © 2012 by the Authors.
Deployment of a two-spacecraft formation into a highly elliptic orbit with collision avoidance / Francesco, Simeoni; Lorenzo, Casalino; Zavoli, Alessandro; Colasurdo, Guido. - ELETTRONICO. - (2012). (Intervento presentato al convegno AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference 2012 tenutosi a Minneapolis, MN nel 13 August 2012 through 16 August 2012) [10.2514/6.2012-4740].
Deployment of a two-spacecraft formation into a highly elliptic orbit with collision avoidance
ZAVOLI, ALESSANDRO;COLASURDO, Guido
2012
Abstract
The finite-thrust deployment of a two-satellite formation into a highly elliptic orbit is optimized by means of an indirect approach, which is based on the theory of optimal control. Earth oblateness and gravitational perturbations from Moon and Sun are considered. The optimization procedure provides the engine switching times and the thrust direction during each burn in order to transfer the satellites to the same prescribed final orbit with assigned distance between them at the apogee passage; the total final mass is maximized. A minimum-distance constraint is introduced when required to avoid collision risk. Different deployment strategies are analyzed; in particular, the classical chaser-target approach is compared to cooperative deployment. Necessary conditions for optimality are derived and numerical results presented. © 2012 by the Authors.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.