The article 8 of the ECHR establishes the right to respect for private and family life that has suffered an expansive rereading by means of an enriching jurisprudence of the different judicial instances, and especially of the resolutions adopted by the relevant European Court of Humans Rights that impact directly and indubitably in the domestic levels. Thus, it is undeniable how the feel of the European jurisprudence is imposed, and uses as impeller of the redefinition of the systems, and as the own law, which provokes the reluctances of certain national courts that feel limited by the direction marked by the ECHR. At the same time, it will be necessary to restate the role of the legislator who, probably, seems to be too much inspired, for not saying determined, for the jurisprudential reasoning.
L'ambito di applicazione dell'art. 8 della Convenzione Europea dei diritti dell'uomo, che sancisce il diritto al rispetto della vita privata e familiare, si è progressivamente e inarrestabilmente ampliato. Nel corso del tempo si è assistito infatti ad una rilettura, ad opera della Corte Europea dei diritti dell’Uomo, del riferimento normativo contenuto nell’art. 8 della Convenzione che ha condotto alla creazione di sempre nuovi diritti. Una nuova giurisprudenza che si è quindi progressivamente imposta anche nella giurisprudenza dei giudici comuni e alle Corte costituzionali riducendo tuttavia lo spazio di intervento del legislatore nazionale.
Nuevos derechos y principio de autodeteminacion entre el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, la Corte constitucional italiana y el legislador nacional. Algunas reflexiones / Rodomonte, Maria Grazia. - In: ESTUDIOS DE DEUSTO. - ISSN 0423-4847. - ELETTRONICO. - 62/2:(2014), pp. 405-419.
Nuevos derechos y principio de autodeteminacion entre el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, la Corte constitucional italiana y el legislador nacional. Algunas reflexiones
RODOMONTE, Maria Grazia
2014
Abstract
The article 8 of the ECHR establishes the right to respect for private and family life that has suffered an expansive rereading by means of an enriching jurisprudence of the different judicial instances, and especially of the resolutions adopted by the relevant European Court of Humans Rights that impact directly and indubitably in the domestic levels. Thus, it is undeniable how the feel of the European jurisprudence is imposed, and uses as impeller of the redefinition of the systems, and as the own law, which provokes the reluctances of certain national courts that feel limited by the direction marked by the ECHR. At the same time, it will be necessary to restate the role of the legislator who, probably, seems to be too much inspired, for not saying determined, for the jurisprudential reasoning.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.