Effects of unilateral ovariectomy on female fertility outcome

Purpose: To compare the fertility outcome among women subjected to unilateral ovariectomy and other abdominal or non-gynaecologic pelvic surgery. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 113 fertile women, surgically treated between 1990 and 2001 at Sapienza University of Rome with unilateral ovariectomy (UO), appendectomy (AP) or cholecystectomy (CO) for benign disease, were analysed for fertility outcome. Patients with assessed pre-surgical fertility defects, previous abdominal or pelvic surgeries and post-surgical contraception were not included. Results: Thirty-five women underwent UO, 39 were subjected to AP and 39 were treated with CO. After a minimum 10-year post-surgical interval, the overall number of successful pregnancies was 75. The rate of women who experienced at least one post-operative successful pregnancy was: 48.5 % in UO, 41 % in AP and 53.8 % in CO (UO vs. AP, P = 0.55; UO vs. CO, P = 0.99; AP vs. CO, P = 0.53). One patient (2.8 %) in UO, one patient (2.6 %) in AP and two patients (5.1 %) in CO underwent Assisted Reproductive Technology to become pregnant. The rate of women who reported at least one miscarriage was: 10/35 (28.5 %) in UO, 11/39 (28.2 %) in AP, 12/39 (30.8 %) in CO (UO vs. AP, P = 0.93; UO vs. CO, P = 0.89; AP vs. CO, P = 0.81). One ectopic pregnancy was reported in CO group and one stillbirth occurred in one AP patient. Conclusions: No statistical difference in terms of post-operative fertility outcome between patients subjected to UO, AP or CO was found, thus allowing to suppose that the removal of one ovary does not significantly worsen the female fertility outcome respect to other abdominal or pelvic procedures. © 2014 Springer-Verlag.

To compare the fertility outcome among women subjected to unilateral ovariectomy and other abdominal or non-gynaecologic pelvic surgery. In this retrospective cohort study, 113 fertile women, surgically treated between 1990 and 2001 at Sapienza University of Rome with unilateral ovariectomy (UO), appendectomy (AP) or cholecystectomy (CO) for benign disease, were analysed for fertility outcome. Patients with assessed pre-surgical fertility defects, previous abdominal or pelvic surgeries and post-surgical contraception were not included. Thirty-five women underwent UO, 39 were subjected to AP and 39 were treated with CO. After a minimum 10-year post-surgical interval, the overall number of successful pregnancies was 75. The rate of women who experienced at least one post-operative successful pregnancy was: 48.5 % in UO, 41 % in AP and 53.8 % in CO (UO vs. AP, P = 0.55; UO vs. CO, P = 0.99; AP vs. CO, P = 0.53). One patient (2.8 %) in UO, one patient (2.6 %) in AP and two patients (5.1 %) in CO underwent Assisted Reproductive Technology to become pregnant. The rate of women who reported at least one miscarriage was: 10/35 (28.5 %) in UO, 11/39 (28.2 %) in AP, 12/39 (30.8 %) in CO (UO vs. AP, P = 0.93; UO vs. CO, P = 0.89; AP vs. CO, P = 0.81). One ectopic pregnancy was reported in CO group and one stillbirth occurred in one AP patient. No statistical difference in terms of post-operative fertility outcome between patients subjected to UO, AP or CO was found, thus allowing to suppose that the removal of one ovary does not significantly worsen the female fertility outcome respect to other abdominal or pelvic procedures.