Among the topics of opinion formation it is of interest to observe the characteristics of networks with a priori distinct communities. The citation network(s) between selected members of the Neocreationist and Intelligent Design and the Darwinian Evolution communities are unfolded through the available internet citations. The resulting adjacency matrix is not symmetric. A generalization of considerations pertaining to the case of networks with tagged nodes and biased links, directed or undirected, is presented. The main characteristic coefficients describing the structure of such networks are outlined. The structural features are discussed searching for statistical aspects of the communities. The degree distributions, each network’s assortativity, specific global and local clustering coefficients and the Average Overlap Indices are especially calculated since the distribution of elements in the rectangular submatrices represent inter-community connections. The various closed and open triangles made from nodes, distinguishing the community, are listed. The z-scores of patterns are calculated. One can distinguish between opinion leaders, followers and main rivals and briefly interpret their relationships through intuitively expected behavior in defence of an opinion. Suggestions for more elaborate models describing such communities and their subsequent structures are found in conclusions.

Organization of networks with tagged nodes and biased links: A priori distinct communities. The case of intelligent design proponents and Darwinian evolution defenders / Rotundo, Giulia; M., Ausloos. - In: PHYSICA. A. - ISSN 0378-4371. - STAMPA. - 389:(2010), pp. 5479-5494. [doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2010.07.029]

Organization of networks with tagged nodes and biased links: A priori distinct communities. The case of intelligent design proponents and Darwinian evolution defenders

ROTUNDO, Giulia;
2010

Abstract

Among the topics of opinion formation it is of interest to observe the characteristics of networks with a priori distinct communities. The citation network(s) between selected members of the Neocreationist and Intelligent Design and the Darwinian Evolution communities are unfolded through the available internet citations. The resulting adjacency matrix is not symmetric. A generalization of considerations pertaining to the case of networks with tagged nodes and biased links, directed or undirected, is presented. The main characteristic coefficients describing the structure of such networks are outlined. The structural features are discussed searching for statistical aspects of the communities. The degree distributions, each network’s assortativity, specific global and local clustering coefficients and the Average Overlap Indices are especially calculated since the distribution of elements in the rectangular submatrices represent inter-community connections. The various closed and open triangles made from nodes, distinguishing the community, are listed. The z-scores of patterns are calculated. One can distinguish between opinion leaders, followers and main rivals and briefly interpret their relationships through intuitively expected behavior in defence of an opinion. Suggestions for more elaborate models describing such communities and their subsequent structures are found in conclusions.
2010
Citation networks, Intelligent design, Darwinian evolution, Creationism, Cluster coefficient, z-score, Overlap index, Assortativity, Opinion discussion
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Organization of networks with tagged nodes and biased links: A priori distinct communities. The case of intelligent design proponents and Darwinian evolution defenders / Rotundo, Giulia; M., Ausloos. - In: PHYSICA. A. - ISSN 0378-4371. - STAMPA. - 389:(2010), pp. 5479-5494. [doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2010.07.029]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/625596
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact