Background. We compared the oncologic effectiveness of open adrenalectomy and endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma. Methods. One hundred fifty-six patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma (stage I/II) who underwent R0 resection were included in an Italian multiinstitutional surgical survey. They were divided into 2 groups based on the operative approach (either conventional or endoscopic). Results. One hundred twenty-six patients underwent open adrenalectomy and 30 patients underwent endoscopic adrenalectomy. The 2 groups were. well matched for age, sex, lesion size, and stage (P = NS). The mean follow-up time was similar for the 2 groups (P = NS). The local recurrence rate was 19% for open adrenalectomy and 21% for endoscopic adrenalectomy, whereas distant metastases were recorded in 31% of patients in the conventional adrenalectomy group and 17% in the endoscopic adrenalectomy group (P = NS). The mean time to recurrence was 27 +/- 27 months in the conventional open adrenalectomy group and 29 +/- 33 months in the endoscopic adrenalectomy group (P = NS). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of 5-year disease-free survival (38.3% vs 58.2%) and 5-year overall survival rates (48% vs 67%; P = NS). Conclusion. The operative approach does not affect the oncologic outcome of patients with. localized adrenocortical carcinoma, if the principles of surgical oncology are respected. (Surge?) 2012; 152: 1158-64.)

Open versus endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of localized (stage I/II) adrenocortical carcinoma: Results of a multiinstitutional Italian survey / Celestino Pio, Lombardi; Marco, Raffaelli; Carmela De, Crea; Marco, Boniardi; DE TOMA, Giorgio; Luigi Antonio, Marzano; Paolo, Miccoli; Francesco, Minni; Mario, Morino; Maria Rosa, Pelizzo; Andrea, Pietrabissa; Andrea, Renda; Andrea, Valeri; Rocco, Bellantone. - In: SURGERY. - ISSN 0039-6060. - 152:6(2012), pp. 1158-1164. [10.1016/j.surg.2012.08.014]

Open versus endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of localized (stage I/II) adrenocortical carcinoma: Results of a multiinstitutional Italian survey

DE TOMA, Giorgio;
2012

Abstract

Background. We compared the oncologic effectiveness of open adrenalectomy and endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma. Methods. One hundred fifty-six patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma (stage I/II) who underwent R0 resection were included in an Italian multiinstitutional surgical survey. They were divided into 2 groups based on the operative approach (either conventional or endoscopic). Results. One hundred twenty-six patients underwent open adrenalectomy and 30 patients underwent endoscopic adrenalectomy. The 2 groups were. well matched for age, sex, lesion size, and stage (P = NS). The mean follow-up time was similar for the 2 groups (P = NS). The local recurrence rate was 19% for open adrenalectomy and 21% for endoscopic adrenalectomy, whereas distant metastases were recorded in 31% of patients in the conventional adrenalectomy group and 17% in the endoscopic adrenalectomy group (P = NS). The mean time to recurrence was 27 +/- 27 months in the conventional open adrenalectomy group and 29 +/- 33 months in the endoscopic adrenalectomy group (P = NS). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of 5-year disease-free survival (38.3% vs 58.2%) and 5-year overall survival rates (48% vs 67%; P = NS). Conclusion. The operative approach does not affect the oncologic outcome of patients with. localized adrenocortical carcinoma, if the principles of surgical oncology are respected. (Surge?) 2012; 152: 1158-64.)
2012
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Open versus endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of localized (stage I/II) adrenocortical carcinoma: Results of a multiinstitutional Italian survey / Celestino Pio, Lombardi; Marco, Raffaelli; Carmela De, Crea; Marco, Boniardi; DE TOMA, Giorgio; Luigi Antonio, Marzano; Paolo, Miccoli; Francesco, Minni; Mario, Morino; Maria Rosa, Pelizzo; Andrea, Pietrabissa; Andrea, Renda; Andrea, Valeri; Rocco, Bellantone. - In: SURGERY. - ISSN 0039-6060. - 152:6(2012), pp. 1158-1164. [10.1016/j.surg.2012.08.014]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/617979
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 32
  • Scopus 113
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 98
social impact