Objective To evaluate the extent of non-publication or delayed publication of registered randomized trials on vaccines, and to investigate potential determinants of delay to publication. Design Survey. Data sources: Trials registry websites, Scopus, PubMed, Google. Study selection Randomized controlled trials evaluating the safety or the efficacy or immunogenicity of human papillomavirus (HPV), pandemic A/H1N1 2009 influenza, and meningococcal, pneumococcal, and rotavirus vaccines that were registered in Clinical Trials.gov, Current Controlled Trials, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Clinical Study Register, or Indian, Australian-New Zealand, and Chinese trial registries in 2006-12. Electronic databases were searched up to February 2014 to identify published manuscripts containing trial results. These were reviewed and classified as positive, mixed, or negative. We also reviewed the results available in ClinicalTrials.gov. Main outcome measures Publication status of trial results and time from completion to publication in peer reviewed journals. Data synthesis Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate potential predictors of publication delay. Results We analysed 384 trials (85% sponsored by industry). Of 355 trials (404 758 participants) that were completed, 176 (n=151 379) had been published in peer reviewed journals. Another 42 trials (total sample 62 765) remained unpublished but reported results in ClinicalTrials.gov. The proportion of trials published 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after completion was 12%, 29%, 53%, and 73%, respectively. Including results posted in ClinicalTrials.gov, 48 months after study completion results were available for 82% of the trials and 90% of the participants. Delay to publication between non-industry and industry sponsored trials did not differ, but non-industry sponsored trials were 4.42-fold (P=0.008) more likely to report negative or mixed findings. Negative results were reported by only 2% of the published trials. Conclusions Most vaccine trials are published eventually or the results posted in ClinicalTrials.gov, but delays to publication of several years are common. Actions should focus on the timely dissemination of data from vaccine trials to the public.

Non-publication and delayed publication of randomized trials on vaccines: survey / L., Manzoli; M. E., Flacco; D'Addario, Maddalena; L., Capasso; DE VITO, Corrado; Marzuillo, Carolina; Villari, Paolo; J. P. A., Ioannidis. - In: BMJ. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL. - ISSN 0959-8138. - ELETTRONICO. - 348:(2014). [10.1136/bmj.g3058]

Non-publication and delayed publication of randomized trials on vaccines: survey

D'ADDARIO, MADDALENA;DE VITO, CORRADO;MARZUILLO, CAROLINA;VILLARI, Paolo;
2014

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the extent of non-publication or delayed publication of registered randomized trials on vaccines, and to investigate potential determinants of delay to publication. Design Survey. Data sources: Trials registry websites, Scopus, PubMed, Google. Study selection Randomized controlled trials evaluating the safety or the efficacy or immunogenicity of human papillomavirus (HPV), pandemic A/H1N1 2009 influenza, and meningococcal, pneumococcal, and rotavirus vaccines that were registered in Clinical Trials.gov, Current Controlled Trials, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Clinical Study Register, or Indian, Australian-New Zealand, and Chinese trial registries in 2006-12. Electronic databases were searched up to February 2014 to identify published manuscripts containing trial results. These were reviewed and classified as positive, mixed, or negative. We also reviewed the results available in ClinicalTrials.gov. Main outcome measures Publication status of trial results and time from completion to publication in peer reviewed journals. Data synthesis Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate potential predictors of publication delay. Results We analysed 384 trials (85% sponsored by industry). Of 355 trials (404 758 participants) that were completed, 176 (n=151 379) had been published in peer reviewed journals. Another 42 trials (total sample 62 765) remained unpublished but reported results in ClinicalTrials.gov. The proportion of trials published 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after completion was 12%, 29%, 53%, and 73%, respectively. Including results posted in ClinicalTrials.gov, 48 months after study completion results were available for 82% of the trials and 90% of the participants. Delay to publication between non-industry and industry sponsored trials did not differ, but non-industry sponsored trials were 4.42-fold (P=0.008) more likely to report negative or mixed findings. Negative results were reported by only 2% of the published trials. Conclusions Most vaccine trials are published eventually or the results posted in ClinicalTrials.gov, but delays to publication of several years are common. Actions should focus on the timely dissemination of data from vaccine trials to the public.
2014
information dissemination; outcome assessment; drug efficacy; peer review; immunogenicity; prediction; meningococcus vaccine; priority journal; drug safety; publication; human; rotavirus vaccine; randomized controlled trial (topic); wart virus vaccine; pneumococcus vaccine; evidence based medicine; influenza vaccine; drug industry; risk benefit analysis
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Non-publication and delayed publication of randomized trials on vaccines: survey / L., Manzoli; M. E., Flacco; D'Addario, Maddalena; L., Capasso; DE VITO, Corrado; Marzuillo, Carolina; Villari, Paolo; J. P. A., Ioannidis. - In: BMJ. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL. - ISSN 0959-8138. - ELETTRONICO. - 348:(2014). [10.1136/bmj.g3058]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Manzoli L BMJ 2014 with both editorials.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 821.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
821.08 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/609984
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 40
  • Scopus 67
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 70
social impact