The prevalence of dyspepsia is up to 40% in population- based study. Functional dyspepsia is an exclusion diagnosis and it is classified as a chronic abdominal pain-related functional disorder, characterized by the presence of persistent or recurrent pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen, neither relief by defecation, nor association with the onset of a change in stool frequency or form. Celiac disease (CD) is a common autoimmune enteropathy, with a prevalence around 1% in the general population. Its diagnosis includes a serological screening and an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with multiple biopsies. Gluten-free diet is the only effective treatment. CD diagnosis is often delayed in asymptomatic patients or in individuals with less clinical gastrointestinal symptoms. Several studies performed coeliac disease screening in patients with symptoms suggestive of dyspepsia, showing a biopsy-proved prevalence that ranged from 0.5% to 2%. The typical endoscopic markers of villous atrophy are not sufficiently sensitive, so some endoscopic techniques, such as “water immersion” and confocal endomicroscopy were proposed to improve the diagnostic sensitivity and target biopsies. A recent meta-analysis estimated that the prevalence of CD was higher in patients with dyspepsia, but not in a statistically significant way. However this assumption should be confirmed further larger studies.

Dyspepsia and celiac disease: Prevalence, diagnostic tools and therapy / Petrarca, Laura; Nenna, Raffaella; Gerarda, Mastrogiorgio; Matteo, Florio; Manuela, Brighi; Pontone, Stefano. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF METHODOLOGY. - ISSN 2222-0682. - ELETTRONICO. - (2014). [10.5662/wjm.v4.i3.189]

Dyspepsia and celiac disease: Prevalence, diagnostic tools and therapy

PETRARCA, LAURA;NENNA, RAFFAELLA;PONTONE, Stefano
2014

Abstract

The prevalence of dyspepsia is up to 40% in population- based study. Functional dyspepsia is an exclusion diagnosis and it is classified as a chronic abdominal pain-related functional disorder, characterized by the presence of persistent or recurrent pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen, neither relief by defecation, nor association with the onset of a change in stool frequency or form. Celiac disease (CD) is a common autoimmune enteropathy, with a prevalence around 1% in the general population. Its diagnosis includes a serological screening and an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with multiple biopsies. Gluten-free diet is the only effective treatment. CD diagnosis is often delayed in asymptomatic patients or in individuals with less clinical gastrointestinal symptoms. Several studies performed coeliac disease screening in patients with symptoms suggestive of dyspepsia, showing a biopsy-proved prevalence that ranged from 0.5% to 2%. The typical endoscopic markers of villous atrophy are not sufficiently sensitive, so some endoscopic techniques, such as “water immersion” and confocal endomicroscopy were proposed to improve the diagnostic sensitivity and target biopsies. A recent meta-analysis estimated that the prevalence of CD was higher in patients with dyspepsia, but not in a statistically significant way. However this assumption should be confirmed further larger studies.
2014
Dyspepsia, Coeliac disease, Upper endoscopy, Villus atrophy, Screening
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Dyspepsia and celiac disease: Prevalence, diagnostic tools and therapy / Petrarca, Laura; Nenna, Raffaella; Gerarda, Mastrogiorgio; Matteo, Florio; Manuela, Brighi; Pontone, Stefano. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF METHODOLOGY. - ISSN 2222-0682. - ELETTRONICO. - (2014). [10.5662/wjm.v4.i3.189]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/607795
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact