The recent proposal to include ‘meaning’ in the ISUF definition of urban morphology (Conzen, 2013) was followed by some discussion (Kropf and Malfroy, 2013). Since the structuralist approach to architecture (Eco, 1967) and to urban studies (Barthes, 1967) urban semiotics has developed into an almost autonomous discipline: in the presence of a large amount of literature, this topic cannot be left to sociological studies alone
New perspectives on the meaning of urban form / Camiz, Alessandro. - ELETTRONICO. - (2014), pp. 47-47. (Intervento presentato al convegno Our common future in Urban Morphology tenutosi a Porto nel 3-6 July 2014).
New perspectives on the meaning of urban form
CAMIZ, Alessandro
2014
Abstract
The recent proposal to include ‘meaning’ in the ISUF definition of urban morphology (Conzen, 2013) was followed by some discussion (Kropf and Malfroy, 2013). Since the structuralist approach to architecture (Eco, 1967) and to urban studies (Barthes, 1967) urban semiotics has developed into an almost autonomous discipline: in the presence of a large amount of literature, this topic cannot be left to sociological studies aloneFile allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.