The recent proposal to include ‘meaning’ in the ISUF definition of urban morphology (Conzen, 2013) was followed by some discussion (Kropf and Malfroy, 2013). Since the structuralist approach to architecture (Eco, 1967) and to urban studies (Barthes, 1967) urban semiotics has developed into an almost autonomous discipline: in the presence of a large amount of literature, this topic cannot be left to sociological studies alone

New perspectives on the meaning of urban form / Camiz, Alessandro. - ELETTRONICO. - (2014), pp. 47-47. (Intervento presentato al convegno Our common future in Urban Morphology tenutosi a Porto nel 3-6 July 2014).

New perspectives on the meaning of urban form

CAMIZ, Alessandro
2014

Abstract

The recent proposal to include ‘meaning’ in the ISUF definition of urban morphology (Conzen, 2013) was followed by some discussion (Kropf and Malfroy, 2013). Since the structuralist approach to architecture (Eco, 1967) and to urban studies (Barthes, 1967) urban semiotics has developed into an almost autonomous discipline: in the presence of a large amount of literature, this topic cannot be left to sociological studies alone
2014
Our common future in Urban Morphology
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04d Abstract in atti di convegno
New perspectives on the meaning of urban form / Camiz, Alessandro. - ELETTRONICO. - (2014), pp. 47-47. (Intervento presentato al convegno Our common future in Urban Morphology tenutosi a Porto nel 3-6 July 2014).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/585783
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact