Framed structures are usually infilled with masonry walls. These may cause significant increase in both stiffness and strength, reducing the deformation demand and increasing the energy dissipation capacity of the system. On the other hand, irregular arrangements of the masonry panels may lead to the concentration of damage in some regions, with negative effects, like for example soft storey mechanisms and shear failures in short columns. Therefore, the presence of infill walls should not be neglected, especially in regions of moderate and high seismicity. To this aim, simple models are available for solid infills walls, such as the diagonal no-tension strut model, while infilled frames with openings have not been investigated adequately. In the present study the effect of openings on strength and stiffness of infilled frames is studied by means of about 150 experimental and numerical tests. The main parameters involved are identified and a simple model to take into account the openings in the infills is developed and compared with other models proposed by different researchers. The model, which is based on the use of strength and stiffness reduction factors, takes into account the opening dimensions and presence of reinforcing elements around the opening. An example of application of the proposed reduction factors is also presented.

Strength and stiffness reduction factors for infilled frames with openings / L. D., Decanini; Liberatore, Laura; Mollaioli, Fabrizio. - In: EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION. - ISSN 1671-3664. - STAMPA. - 13:3(2014), pp. 437-454. [10.1007/s11803-014-0254-9]

Strength and stiffness reduction factors for infilled frames with openings

LIBERATORE, Laura;MOLLAIOLI, Fabrizio
2014

Abstract

Framed structures are usually infilled with masonry walls. These may cause significant increase in both stiffness and strength, reducing the deformation demand and increasing the energy dissipation capacity of the system. On the other hand, irregular arrangements of the masonry panels may lead to the concentration of damage in some regions, with negative effects, like for example soft storey mechanisms and shear failures in short columns. Therefore, the presence of infill walls should not be neglected, especially in regions of moderate and high seismicity. To this aim, simple models are available for solid infills walls, such as the diagonal no-tension strut model, while infilled frames with openings have not been investigated adequately. In the present study the effect of openings on strength and stiffness of infilled frames is studied by means of about 150 experimental and numerical tests. The main parameters involved are identified and a simple model to take into account the openings in the infills is developed and compared with other models proposed by different researchers. The model, which is based on the use of strength and stiffness reduction factors, takes into account the opening dimensions and presence of reinforcing elements around the opening. An example of application of the proposed reduction factors is also presented.
2014
infilled frames; openings; strength; stiffness; reduction factor
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Strength and stiffness reduction factors for infilled frames with openings / L. D., Decanini; Liberatore, Laura; Mollaioli, Fabrizio. - In: EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION. - ISSN 1671-3664. - STAMPA. - 13:3(2014), pp. 437-454. [10.1007/s11803-014-0254-9]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Decanini_Strength_2014.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 2.1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.1 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/552928
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 95
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 73
social impact