Although dental implants have undergone impressive evolution in recent years, periimplantitis still remains a relevant problem and information on the susceptibility of commercial implants to bacterial colonization is insufficient. This work evaluated the susceptibility of different commercial implants to bacterial colonization, to identify key features for good performances. Twenty-four implants, produced with different technologies, were colonized with 9 bacterial strains following pre-conditioning with culture medium, or saliva or serum proteins and adherent bacteria were enumerated by Real Time quantitative PCR. The studied implants differed significantly for susceptibility to bacterial adhesion. Pre-conditioning of surfaces affected adhesion assays in a species specific manner. Although surface topography influenced bacterial adhesiveness, implants produced by different manufacturers with comparable technologies showed great variability of results. These data demonstrate that susceptibility of implants to bacterial colonization is influenced by productive technologies (in a surface topography proportional manner) and by the productive environment. In choosing an implant the clinician should rely upon specific experimental studies, because surface characteristics alone cannot predict susceptibility to colonization by pathogenic bacteria. Tests should include assays performed in the medium of culture and in the presence of serum proteins.

IN VITRO ADHESION OF COMMENSAL AND PATHOGENIC BACTERIA TO COMMERCIAL TITANIUM IMPLANTS WITH DIFFERENT SURFACES / Passariello, Claudio; F., Pera; P., Gigola. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMMUNOPATHOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY. - ISSN 0394-6320. - 26:2(2013), pp. 453-462.

IN VITRO ADHESION OF COMMENSAL AND PATHOGENIC BACTERIA TO COMMERCIAL TITANIUM IMPLANTS WITH DIFFERENT SURFACES

PASSARIELLO, Claudio;
2013

Abstract

Although dental implants have undergone impressive evolution in recent years, periimplantitis still remains a relevant problem and information on the susceptibility of commercial implants to bacterial colonization is insufficient. This work evaluated the susceptibility of different commercial implants to bacterial colonization, to identify key features for good performances. Twenty-four implants, produced with different technologies, were colonized with 9 bacterial strains following pre-conditioning with culture medium, or saliva or serum proteins and adherent bacteria were enumerated by Real Time quantitative PCR. The studied implants differed significantly for susceptibility to bacterial adhesion. Pre-conditioning of surfaces affected adhesion assays in a species specific manner. Although surface topography influenced bacterial adhesiveness, implants produced by different manufacturers with comparable technologies showed great variability of results. These data demonstrate that susceptibility of implants to bacterial colonization is influenced by productive technologies (in a surface topography proportional manner) and by the productive environment. In choosing an implant the clinician should rely upon specific experimental studies, because surface characteristics alone cannot predict susceptibility to colonization by pathogenic bacteria. Tests should include assays performed in the medium of culture and in the presence of serum proteins.
2013
bacterial adhesion; pathogenic bacteria; titanium; surface topography; dental implants
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
IN VITRO ADHESION OF COMMENSAL AND PATHOGENIC BACTERIA TO COMMERCIAL TITANIUM IMPLANTS WITH DIFFERENT SURFACES / Passariello, Claudio; F., Pera; P., Gigola. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMMUNOPATHOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY. - ISSN 0394-6320. - 26:2(2013), pp. 453-462.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/544155
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact