Structural breaks have become an important research topic in time series analysis and in many fields of application, e.g. econometrics, hydrology, seismology, engineering and industry, chemometrics, and medicine. In most phenomena encountered in the real world modeling assuming no change of structure may obviously lead to inconsistent estimates and poor forecasts. Much research work has been carried out in the past decades and efforts mostly concentrated on the identification of points in time where structural breaks possibly occur and on the development of statistical tests of absence of breaks. Common procedures are the CUSUM based statistics and the F based statistics proposed by Bai and Perron in several papers and technical reports. The need of specification of a probability distribution for conducting the statistical tests has been often a drawback in practical applications. If the distribution is misspecified the test may turn to be unreliable. In this paper a distribution free procedure for identification of change points and testing for structural breaks is proposed based on the empirical likelihood and the empirical likelihood ratio statistics. A comparison with the F test and the CUSUM test is performed on both simulated and real world data. The size and power of the test is comparable with existing procedures and the identification procedure is generally accurate and effective.

Empirical likelihood for break detection in time series / Baragona, Roberto; Battaglia, Francesco; Cucina, Domenico. - In: ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS. - ISSN 1935-7524. - ELETTRONICO. - 7:1(2013), pp. 3089-3123. [10.1214/13-ejs873]

Empirical likelihood for break detection in time series

BARAGONA, Roberto;BATTAGLIA, Francesco;CUCINA, Domenico
2013

Abstract

Structural breaks have become an important research topic in time series analysis and in many fields of application, e.g. econometrics, hydrology, seismology, engineering and industry, chemometrics, and medicine. In most phenomena encountered in the real world modeling assuming no change of structure may obviously lead to inconsistent estimates and poor forecasts. Much research work has been carried out in the past decades and efforts mostly concentrated on the identification of points in time where structural breaks possibly occur and on the development of statistical tests of absence of breaks. Common procedures are the CUSUM based statistics and the F based statistics proposed by Bai and Perron in several papers and technical reports. The need of specification of a probability distribution for conducting the statistical tests has been often a drawback in practical applications. If the distribution is misspecified the test may turn to be unreliable. In this paper a distribution free procedure for identification of change points and testing for structural breaks is proposed based on the empirical likelihood and the empirical likelihood ratio statistics. A comparison with the F test and the CUSUM test is performed on both simulated and real world data. The size and power of the test is comparable with existing procedures and the identification procedure is generally accurate and effective.
2013
time series; level shift; structural change; empirical likelihood; likelihood ratio test; estimating equations
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Empirical likelihood for break detection in time series / Baragona, Roberto; Battaglia, Francesco; Cucina, Domenico. - In: ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS. - ISSN 1935-7524. - ELETTRONICO. - 7:1(2013), pp. 3089-3123. [10.1214/13-ejs873]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/535594
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact