Introduction In male sexual dysfunction (MSD), the presence of sexual comorbidities is relatively frequent. However, what is still a matter of controversy is what the first-line therapy in these patients should be. MethodsThree scientists and the editor of the Controversies section, all experts in the medical treatment of MSD, present different perspectives on the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5), testosterone and dapoxetine in erectile dysfunction (ED), hypogonadism, and premature ejaculation (PE). The psychological aspects are discussed by an outstanding expert in psychosexology. Main Outcome MeasureExpert opinion supported by the critical review of the currently available literature. ResultsTestosterone should be used before PDE5s in hypogonadal men with comorbid ED; PDE5s should be used before dapoxetine in PE patients with comorbid ED, and counseling should be offered to all subjects with MSD. Conclusions Although the answer to the question which should be first? is controversial in almost all MSDs, intuition, experience, and evidence should guide the choice of which treatment should be used first. This decision is highly critical in influencing the therapeutic outcome as well the patient's and couple's adherence to treatment. Jannini EA, Isidori AM, Aversa A, Lenzi A, and Althof SE. Which is first? The controversial issue of precedence in the treatment of male sexual dysfunctions. J Sex Med 2013;10:2359-2369.

Which is first? The controversial issue of precedence in the treatment of male sexual dysfunctions / Emmanuele A., Jannini; Isidori, Andrea; Aversa, Antonio; Lenzi, Andrea; S. E., Althof. - In: JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1743-6095. - STAMPA. - 10:10(2013), pp. 2359-2369. [10.1111/jsm.12315]

Which is first? The controversial issue of precedence in the treatment of male sexual dysfunctions.

ISIDORI, Andrea;AVERSA, Antonio;LENZI, Andrea;
2013

Abstract

Introduction In male sexual dysfunction (MSD), the presence of sexual comorbidities is relatively frequent. However, what is still a matter of controversy is what the first-line therapy in these patients should be. MethodsThree scientists and the editor of the Controversies section, all experts in the medical treatment of MSD, present different perspectives on the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5), testosterone and dapoxetine in erectile dysfunction (ED), hypogonadism, and premature ejaculation (PE). The psychological aspects are discussed by an outstanding expert in psychosexology. Main Outcome MeasureExpert opinion supported by the critical review of the currently available literature. ResultsTestosterone should be used before PDE5s in hypogonadal men with comorbid ED; PDE5s should be used before dapoxetine in PE patients with comorbid ED, and counseling should be offered to all subjects with MSD. Conclusions Although the answer to the question which should be first? is controversial in almost all MSDs, intuition, experience, and evidence should guide the choice of which treatment should be used first. This decision is highly critical in influencing the therapeutic outcome as well the patient's and couple's adherence to treatment. Jannini EA, Isidori AM, Aversa A, Lenzi A, and Althof SE. Which is first? The controversial issue of precedence in the treatment of male sexual dysfunctions. J Sex Med 2013;10:2359-2369.
2013
dapoxetine; testosterone; sildenafil; precedence; tadalafil; flowchart; vardenafil
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Which is first? The controversial issue of precedence in the treatment of male sexual dysfunctions / Emmanuele A., Jannini; Isidori, Andrea; Aversa, Antonio; Lenzi, Andrea; S. E., Althof. - In: JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1743-6095. - STAMPA. - 10:10(2013), pp. 2359-2369. [10.1111/jsm.12315]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/535288
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 19
  • Scopus 60
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 55
social impact