Background and aims: Apart from late motor nerve dysfunction, factors affecting muscle strength in diabetes are largely unknown. This study was aimed at assessing muscle strength correlates in diabetic subjects encompassing a wide range of peripheral nerve function and various degrees of micro and macrovascular complications. Methods and results: Four-hundred consecutive patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes (aged 46.4 +/- 13.9 and 65.8 +/- 10.3 years, respectively) from the Study on the Assessment of Determinants of Muscle and Bone Strength Abnormalities in Diabetes (SAMBA) were examined for upper and lower body muscle isometric maximal voluntary contraction by dynamometry. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were applied to identify strength correlates. Isometric force at both the upper and lower limbs was significantly lower in subjects with than in those without any complication. At univariate analysis, it was strongly associated with age, diabetes duration, physical activity (PA) level, cardio-respiratory fitness, anthropometric parameters, surrogate measures of complications, and parameters of sensory and autonomic, but not motor (except amplitude) neuropathy. Multivariate analysis revealed that upper and lower body strength correlated independently with male gender and, inversely, with age, autonomic neuropathy score (or individual autonomic function abnormalities), and vibration perception threshold, but not sensory-motor neuropathy score. Diabetes duration and PA level were excluded from the model. Conclusions: Both upper and lower body muscle strength correlate with measures of diabetic complications and particularly with parameters of sensory and especially autonomic nerve function, independently of diabetes duration and PA level, thus suggesting the involvement of mechanisms other than manifest motor nerve impairment. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Correlates of muscle strength in diabetes The study on the assessment of determinants of muscle and bone strength abnormalities in diabetes (SAMBA) / Balducci, S.; Sacchetti, M.; Orlando, G.; Salvi, Laura; Pugliese, L.; Salerno, G.; D'Errico, V.; Iacobini, Carla; Conti, Francesco; Zanuso, S.; Nicolucci, A.; Pugliese, Giuseppe; Study on the Assessment of Determinants of Muscle, ; Bone Strength Abnormalities in Diabetes SAMBA Investigators,. - In: NMCD. NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES. - ISSN 0939-4753. - STAMPA. - 24:1(2014), pp. 18-26. [10.1016/j.numecd.2013.04.010]

Correlates of muscle strength in diabetes The study on the assessment of determinants of muscle and bone strength abnormalities in diabetes (SAMBA)

SALVI, LAURA;G. Salerno;IACOBINI, carla;CONTI, Francesco;PUGLIESE, Giuseppe
Ultimo
;
2014

Abstract

Background and aims: Apart from late motor nerve dysfunction, factors affecting muscle strength in diabetes are largely unknown. This study was aimed at assessing muscle strength correlates in diabetic subjects encompassing a wide range of peripheral nerve function and various degrees of micro and macrovascular complications. Methods and results: Four-hundred consecutive patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes (aged 46.4 +/- 13.9 and 65.8 +/- 10.3 years, respectively) from the Study on the Assessment of Determinants of Muscle and Bone Strength Abnormalities in Diabetes (SAMBA) were examined for upper and lower body muscle isometric maximal voluntary contraction by dynamometry. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were applied to identify strength correlates. Isometric force at both the upper and lower limbs was significantly lower in subjects with than in those without any complication. At univariate analysis, it was strongly associated with age, diabetes duration, physical activity (PA) level, cardio-respiratory fitness, anthropometric parameters, surrogate measures of complications, and parameters of sensory and autonomic, but not motor (except amplitude) neuropathy. Multivariate analysis revealed that upper and lower body strength correlated independently with male gender and, inversely, with age, autonomic neuropathy score (or individual autonomic function abnormalities), and vibration perception threshold, but not sensory-motor neuropathy score. Diabetes duration and PA level were excluded from the model. Conclusions: Both upper and lower body muscle strength correlate with measures of diabetic complications and particularly with parameters of sensory and especially autonomic nerve function, independently of diabetes duration and PA level, thus suggesting the involvement of mechanisms other than manifest motor nerve impairment. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
2014
hr; can; diabetes; dpn; abi; cvd; peripheral neuropathy; ckd; egfr; chronic kidney disease; ct; carts; bp; mvc; muscle strength; pa; ei; vpt; imt; samba; ckd-epi; dr
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Correlates of muscle strength in diabetes The study on the assessment of determinants of muscle and bone strength abnormalities in diabetes (SAMBA) / Balducci, S.; Sacchetti, M.; Orlando, G.; Salvi, Laura; Pugliese, L.; Salerno, G.; D'Errico, V.; Iacobini, Carla; Conti, Francesco; Zanuso, S.; Nicolucci, A.; Pugliese, Giuseppe; Study on the Assessment of Determinants of Muscle, ; Bone Strength Abnormalities in Diabetes SAMBA Investigators,. - In: NMCD. NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES. - ISSN 0939-4753. - STAMPA. - 24:1(2014), pp. 18-26. [10.1016/j.numecd.2013.04.010]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Balducci_Correlates_2014.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 761.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
761.88 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/526279
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact