Objective: To assess pregnancy outcome among women with hyperemesis gravidarum (HEG) with and without total parenteral nutrition (TPN) support. Study Design: A retrospective study of all pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who were hospitalized due to HEG between 1997 and 2011. Pregnancy outcome was compared with a control group without HEG matched by maternal age and parity in a 3:1 ratio. Results: Overall 599 women were admitted during the study period with the diagnosis of HEG and subsequently delivered in our center. Of those, 122 (20.4%) received TPN support. Women in the HEG group were characterized by a higher rate of severe preeclampsia (1.3% vs. 0.5%, p=0.04), and a higher rate of preterm delivery at less than 37 and 34 weeks (10.9% vs. 6.9%, p<0.001, and 4.7% vs. 1.6%, p<0.001, respectively). Neonates in the HEG group were characterized by a lower birthweight (3074±456g vs. 3248±543g, p<0.001), higher rate of birthweight<10th percentile (12.7% vs. 6.8%, P<0.001), and a higher rate of neonatal morbidity (8.7% vs. 3.8%, p<0.001). These associations persisted after adjustment for potential confounders, and were of most notable among women with HEG who did not receive TPN support. Conclusion: HEG is an independent risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome. TPN support during early pregnancy is associated with a decreased risk for perinatal morbidity.

The fetal head evaluation during labour in the occiput posterior position: the esa (evaluation by simulation algorithm) approach / A., Malvasi; M., Bochicchio; L., Vaira; A., Longo; Pacella, Elena; A., Tinelli. - In: THE JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1476-7058. - (2013). [10.3109/14767058.2013.851188]

The fetal head evaluation during labour in the occiput posterior position: the esa (evaluation by simulation algorithm) approach

PACELLA, Elena;
2013

Abstract

Objective: To assess pregnancy outcome among women with hyperemesis gravidarum (HEG) with and without total parenteral nutrition (TPN) support. Study Design: A retrospective study of all pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who were hospitalized due to HEG between 1997 and 2011. Pregnancy outcome was compared with a control group without HEG matched by maternal age and parity in a 3:1 ratio. Results: Overall 599 women were admitted during the study period with the diagnosis of HEG and subsequently delivered in our center. Of those, 122 (20.4%) received TPN support. Women in the HEG group were characterized by a higher rate of severe preeclampsia (1.3% vs. 0.5%, p=0.04), and a higher rate of preterm delivery at less than 37 and 34 weeks (10.9% vs. 6.9%, p<0.001, and 4.7% vs. 1.6%, p<0.001, respectively). Neonates in the HEG group were characterized by a lower birthweight (3074±456g vs. 3248±543g, p<0.001), higher rate of birthweight<10th percentile (12.7% vs. 6.8%, P<0.001), and a higher rate of neonatal morbidity (8.7% vs. 3.8%, p<0.001). These associations persisted after adjustment for potential confounders, and were of most notable among women with HEG who did not receive TPN support. Conclusion: HEG is an independent risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome. TPN support during early pregnancy is associated with a decreased risk for perinatal morbidity.
2013
Hyperemesis gravidarum; pregnancy; total parenteral nutrition
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The fetal head evaluation during labour in the occiput posterior position: the esa (evaluation by simulation algorithm) approach / A., Malvasi; M., Bochicchio; L., Vaira; A., Longo; Pacella, Elena; A., Tinelli. - In: THE JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1476-7058. - (2013). [10.3109/14767058.2013.851188]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/526012
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact