Can philosophy still be fruitful, and what kind o f philosophy can be such? In particular, what kind of philosophy can be legitimized in the face of sciences? The aim of this paper is to a nswer these questions, listing the characteristics philosophy should have to be fruitful and legitimized in the face of sciences. Since the char acteristics in question demand that philosophy search for new knowledge and new rules of discovery, a philosophy with such characteristics m ay be called the ‘heuristic view’. According to the heuristic view, philosophy is an inquiry into the world which is continuous with the sciences. It differs from them only because it deals with questions whic h are beyond the present sciences, and in order to deal with them mu st try unexplored routes. By so doing, when successful, it may even g ive birth to new sciences. In listing the characteristics that philo sophy should have, the paper systematically compares them with classical a nalytic philosophy, because the

Can philosophy still be fruitful, and what kind of philosophy can be such? In particular, what kind of philosophy can be legitimized in the face of sciences? The aim of this paper is to answer these questions, listing the characteristics philosophy should have to be fruitful and legitimized in the face of sciences. Since the characteristics in question demand that philosophy search for new knowledge and new rules of discovery, a philosophy with such characteristics may be called the ‘heuristic view’. According to the heuristic view, philosophy is an inquiry into the world which is continuous with the sciences. It differs from them only because it deals with questions which are beyond the present sciences, and in order to deal with them must try unexplored routes. By so doing, when successful, it may even give birth to new sciences. In listing the characteristics that philosophy should have, the paper systematically compares them with classical analytic philosophy, because the latter has been the dominant philosophical tradition in the last century.

Rethinking Philosophy / Cellucci, Carlo. - In: PHILOSOPHIA. - ISSN 1574-9274. - STAMPA. - 42:(2014), pp. 271-288. [10.1007/s11406-013-9497-3]

Rethinking Philosophy

CELLUCCI, Carlo
2014

Abstract

Can philosophy still be fruitful, and what kind o f philosophy can be such? In particular, what kind of philosophy can be legitimized in the face of sciences? The aim of this paper is to a nswer these questions, listing the characteristics philosophy should have to be fruitful and legitimized in the face of sciences. Since the char acteristics in question demand that philosophy search for new knowledge and new rules of discovery, a philosophy with such characteristics m ay be called the ‘heuristic view’. According to the heuristic view, philosophy is an inquiry into the world which is continuous with the sciences. It differs from them only because it deals with questions whic h are beyond the present sciences, and in order to deal with them mu st try unexplored routes. By so doing, when successful, it may even g ive birth to new sciences. In listing the characteristics that philo sophy should have, the paper systematically compares them with classical a nalytic philosophy, because the
2014
Can philosophy still be fruitful, and what kind of philosophy can be such? In particular, what kind of philosophy can be legitimized in the face of sciences? The aim of this paper is to answer these questions, listing the characteristics philosophy should have to be fruitful and legitimized in the face of sciences. Since the characteristics in question demand that philosophy search for new knowledge and new rules of discovery, a philosophy with such characteristics may be called the ‘heuristic view’. According to the heuristic view, philosophy is an inquiry into the world which is continuous with the sciences. It differs from them only because it deals with questions which are beyond the present sciences, and in order to deal with them must try unexplored routes. By so doing, when successful, it may even give birth to new sciences. In listing the characteristics that philosophy should have, the paper systematically compares them with classical analytic philosophy, because the latter has been the dominant philosophical tradition in the last century.
Philosophy and Knowledge; Philosophy and Sciences; Armchair Philosophy; Analytic Philosophy; Heuristic View
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Rethinking Philosophy / Cellucci, Carlo. - In: PHILOSOPHIA. - ISSN 1574-9274. - STAMPA. - 42:(2014), pp. 271-288. [10.1007/s11406-013-9497-3]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/523558
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact