Background: The construct of self-compassion is receiving increased attention due to its strong link to mental health. Nonetheless, many questions concerning its dimensionality and construct validity remain open. Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factorial structure and construct validity of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) in a sample of 424 Italian participants ranging in age from 17 to 65 years. Method: SCS was translated with a back-translation procedure and then administered through an on-line survey, along with measures of self-blame, subjective loneliness, emotion regulation, depression and anxiety. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the six-factor model both in the overall sample and in gender and age subgroups. CFA did not support the single higher-order factor of self-compassion, originally found by the author of the scale. Negative associations of Self-Kindness, Common Humanity and Mindfulness subscales with anxiety and depression were confirmed. Moreover, negative correlations of these subscales with self-blame, positive correlations with reappraisal and non-significant associations with expressive suppression and subjective loneliness were found, unveiling aspects of the construct not fully investigated in empirical research. Conclusions: Findings suggest that the SCS is a reliable tool but its dimensionality may vary according to different cultural contexts.

Dimensionality of self-compassion: translation and construct validation of the self-compassion scale in an Italian sample / Petrocchi, Nicola; Ottaviani, Cristina; Couyoumdjian, Alessandro. - In: JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH. - ISSN 0963-8237. - ELETTRONICO. - 23:2(2014), pp. 72-77. [10.3109/09638237.2013.841869]

Dimensionality of self-compassion: translation and construct validation of the self-compassion scale in an Italian sample

PETROCCHI, NICOLA;OTTAVIANI, CRISTINA;COUYOUMDJIAN, Alessandro
2014

Abstract

Background: The construct of self-compassion is receiving increased attention due to its strong link to mental health. Nonetheless, many questions concerning its dimensionality and construct validity remain open. Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factorial structure and construct validity of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) in a sample of 424 Italian participants ranging in age from 17 to 65 years. Method: SCS was translated with a back-translation procedure and then administered through an on-line survey, along with measures of self-blame, subjective loneliness, emotion regulation, depression and anxiety. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the six-factor model both in the overall sample and in gender and age subgroups. CFA did not support the single higher-order factor of self-compassion, originally found by the author of the scale. Negative associations of Self-Kindness, Common Humanity and Mindfulness subscales with anxiety and depression were confirmed. Moreover, negative correlations of these subscales with self-blame, positive correlations with reappraisal and non-significant associations with expressive suppression and subjective loneliness were found, unveiling aspects of the construct not fully investigated in empirical research. Conclusions: Findings suggest that the SCS is a reliable tool but its dimensionality may vary according to different cultural contexts.
2014
italian validation; self-blame; self-compassion scale; dimensionality; coping
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Dimensionality of self-compassion: translation and construct validation of the self-compassion scale in an Italian sample / Petrocchi, Nicola; Ottaviani, Cristina; Couyoumdjian, Alessandro. - In: JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH. - ISSN 0963-8237. - ELETTRONICO. - 23:2(2014), pp. 72-77. [10.3109/09638237.2013.841869]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/519583
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 72
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 65
social impact