To assess the efficacy of LEF administered with or without a loading dose in DMARD-naïve patients with early RA. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized clinical trial included adults with RA diagnosed within 6 months (ACR criteria). Patients were randomly selected to receive either a 100 mg loading dose or a 20 mg fixed dose of LEF for 3 days, followed by a 3-month open-label maintenance period of 20 mg LEF qd. The primary outcome criterion was ACR20 response rate at study end in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary criteria were ACR20, ACR50, ACR70 and DAS28 response rates at 1 and 3 months and safety. The intent-to-treat population included 120 patients (median time since diagnosis 0.95 months). The ACR20 response rate at study end was 69.0% (95%CI 60.5%, 77.4%). Response rates were significantly lower (P = 0.025) in the loading-dose group [58.5% (45.2%, 71.8%)] than in the fixed-dose group [77.8% (67.5%, 88.0%)]. Three-month ACR50, ACR70 and DAS28 response rates were 41.4%, 17.7% and 81.7%, respectively, with no significant differences between groups. Adverse events occurred in 53.7% (loading-dose group) and 49.3% (fixed-dose group) of patients, most frequently diarrhoea and elevated hepatic enzymes; these occurred more frequently and earlier in treatment when the loading dose was used. LEF was effective in DMARD-naïve patients with early disease. No incremental benefit was observed with the use of a loading dose, which may be associated with an increased initial rate of adverse events. The advantage of LEF initiation with a loading dose is not confirmed in this population. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT00596206.

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in DMARD-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of a loading and a fixed-dose regimen / M., Cutolo; H., Bolosiu; G., Perdriset; (., Sedova Leader Study Group; P., Karel; P., Horak; F., Trotta; N., Malavolta; S., Devita; F., Fantini; P., Meroni; Valesini, Guido; M., Galeazzi; W., Grassi; M., Matucci Cerinic; L., Punzi; S. C., Bae; S. H., Park; S. I., Kim; C. H., Suhn; H. A., Kim; S. C., Shim; C., Afonso Mdo; G., Figueiredo; M., Parente; H. D., Bolosiu; R., Ionescu; C., Codreanu. - In: RHEUMATOLOGY. - ISSN 1462-0332. - STAMPA. - 52:6(2013), pp. 1132-1140. [10.1093/rheumatology/kes321]

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in DMARD-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of a loading and a fixed-dose regimen.

VALESINI, Guido;
2013

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of LEF administered with or without a loading dose in DMARD-naïve patients with early RA. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized clinical trial included adults with RA diagnosed within 6 months (ACR criteria). Patients were randomly selected to receive either a 100 mg loading dose or a 20 mg fixed dose of LEF for 3 days, followed by a 3-month open-label maintenance period of 20 mg LEF qd. The primary outcome criterion was ACR20 response rate at study end in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary criteria were ACR20, ACR50, ACR70 and DAS28 response rates at 1 and 3 months and safety. The intent-to-treat population included 120 patients (median time since diagnosis 0.95 months). The ACR20 response rate at study end was 69.0% (95%CI 60.5%, 77.4%). Response rates were significantly lower (P = 0.025) in the loading-dose group [58.5% (45.2%, 71.8%)] than in the fixed-dose group [77.8% (67.5%, 88.0%)]. Three-month ACR50, ACR70 and DAS28 response rates were 41.4%, 17.7% and 81.7%, respectively, with no significant differences between groups. Adverse events occurred in 53.7% (loading-dose group) and 49.3% (fixed-dose group) of patients, most frequently diarrhoea and elevated hepatic enzymes; these occurred more frequently and earlier in treatment when the loading dose was used. LEF was effective in DMARD-naïve patients with early disease. No incremental benefit was observed with the use of a loading dose, which may be associated with an increased initial rate of adverse events. The advantage of LEF initiation with a loading dose is not confirmed in this population. ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT00596206.
2013
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in DMARD-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of a loading and a fixed-dose regimen / M., Cutolo; H., Bolosiu; G., Perdriset; (., Sedova Leader Study Group; P., Karel; P., Horak; F., Trotta; N., Malavolta; S., Devita; F., Fantini; P., Meroni; Valesini, Guido; M., Galeazzi; W., Grassi; M., Matucci Cerinic; L., Punzi; S. C., Bae; S. H., Park; S. I., Kim; C. H., Suhn; H. A., Kim; S. C., Shim; C., Afonso Mdo; G., Figueiredo; M., Parente; H. D., Bolosiu; R., Ionescu; C., Codreanu. - In: RHEUMATOLOGY. - ISSN 1462-0332. - STAMPA. - 52:6(2013), pp. 1132-1140. [10.1093/rheumatology/kes321]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/517360
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact