BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Approved use of intravenous alteplase for ischemic stroke offers net benefit. Pooled randomized controlled trial analysis suggests additional patients could benefit but others be harmed with treatment initiated beyond 4·5 h after stroke onset. We proposed prognostic scoring methods to identify a strategy for patient selection. METHODS: We selected 500 patients treated by intravenous alteplase and 500 controls from Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive, matching modified Rankin score outcomes to those from pooled randomized controlled trial 4·5-6 h data. We ranked patients by prognostic score. We chose limits to optimize our sample for a net treatment benefit significant at P = 0·01 by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and by ordinal regression. For validation, we had these applied to the pooled randomized controlled trial data for 4·5-6 h, testing for net benefit by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, ordinal regression, and also by dichotomized outcomes: modified Rankin score 0-1, mortality and parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 bleeds. All analyses were adjusted for age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. RESULTS: In the training dataset, limits of 56-95 on a prognostic score retained 714 patients in whom there was net benefit significant at P = 0·01. When applied to the 1120 patients in the pooled randomized controlled trial 4·5-6 h dataset, score limits of 56-95 retained 711 patients and gave odds ratio for improved modified Rankin score distribution of 1·13, 95% confidence interval 0·87-1·47, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel P = 0·89. More patients achieved modified Rankin score 0-1 (odds ratio 1·44, 1·02-2·05, P = 0·04) but mortality and parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 bleeds were increased: odds ratio 1·56, 1·01-2·40, P = 0·04; odds ratio 15·6, 3·7-65·8, P = 0·0002, respectively. CONCLUSION: Selection of patients between 4·5 and 6 h based on simple clinical measures failed to deliver a population in whom the alteplase effect would be safe and effective. © 2013 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2013 World Stroke Organization.

Selection for delayed intravenous alteplase treatment based on a prognostic score / R. L., Fulton; K. R., Lees; E., Bluhmki; G., Biegert; G. W., Albers; S. M., Davis; G. A., Donnan; J. C., Grotta; W., Hacke; M., Kaste; R., Von Kummer; A., Shuaib; Toni, Danilo; A., Alexandrov; P. W., Bath; L., Claesson; J., Curram; H. C., Diener; M., Fisher; B., Gregson; M. G., Hennerici; M., Hommel; P., Lyden; J., Marler; K., Muir; R., Sacco; P., Teal; N. G., Wahlgren; S., Warach; C., Weimar; Collaboration, Vista; Ecass Atlantis, Ninds; Epithet, Investigators. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE. - ISSN 1747-4930. - ELETTRONICO. - (2013). [10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00943.x]

Selection for delayed intravenous alteplase treatment based on a prognostic score.

TONI, Danilo;
2013

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Approved use of intravenous alteplase for ischemic stroke offers net benefit. Pooled randomized controlled trial analysis suggests additional patients could benefit but others be harmed with treatment initiated beyond 4·5 h after stroke onset. We proposed prognostic scoring methods to identify a strategy for patient selection. METHODS: We selected 500 patients treated by intravenous alteplase and 500 controls from Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive, matching modified Rankin score outcomes to those from pooled randomized controlled trial 4·5-6 h data. We ranked patients by prognostic score. We chose limits to optimize our sample for a net treatment benefit significant at P = 0·01 by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and by ordinal regression. For validation, we had these applied to the pooled randomized controlled trial data for 4·5-6 h, testing for net benefit by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, ordinal regression, and also by dichotomized outcomes: modified Rankin score 0-1, mortality and parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 bleeds. All analyses were adjusted for age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. RESULTS: In the training dataset, limits of 56-95 on a prognostic score retained 714 patients in whom there was net benefit significant at P = 0·01. When applied to the 1120 patients in the pooled randomized controlled trial 4·5-6 h dataset, score limits of 56-95 retained 711 patients and gave odds ratio for improved modified Rankin score distribution of 1·13, 95% confidence interval 0·87-1·47, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel P = 0·89. More patients achieved modified Rankin score 0-1 (odds ratio 1·44, 1·02-2·05, P = 0·04) but mortality and parenchymal hemorrhage type 2 bleeds were increased: odds ratio 1·56, 1·01-2·40, P = 0·04; odds ratio 15·6, 3·7-65·8, P = 0·0002, respectively. CONCLUSION: Selection of patients between 4·5 and 6 h based on simple clinical measures failed to deliver a population in whom the alteplase effect would be safe and effective. © 2013 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2013 World Stroke Organization.
2013
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Selection for delayed intravenous alteplase treatment based on a prognostic score / R. L., Fulton; K. R., Lees; E., Bluhmki; G., Biegert; G. W., Albers; S. M., Davis; G. A., Donnan; J. C., Grotta; W., Hacke; M., Kaste; R., Von Kummer; A., Shuaib; Toni, Danilo; A., Alexandrov; P. W., Bath; L., Claesson; J., Curram; H. C., Diener; M., Fisher; B., Gregson; M. G., Hennerici; M., Hommel; P., Lyden; J., Marler; K., Muir; R., Sacco; P., Teal; N. G., Wahlgren; S., Warach; C., Weimar; Collaboration, Vista; Ecass Atlantis, Ninds; Epithet, Investigators. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE. - ISSN 1747-4930. - ELETTRONICO. - (2013). [10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00943.x]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/512660
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact