BERNARDI, M., E. GUERRA, B. DI GIACINTO, A. DI CESARE, V. CASTELLANO, and Y. BHAMBHANI. Field Evaluation of Paralympic Athletes in Selected Sports: Implications for Training. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 1200-1208, 2010. Purpose: The purpose of this study was 1) to describe the acute cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses of Paralympic athletes participating in the following five sports: Nordic sit skiing (NS, n = 5), wheelchair distance racing (WR, n = 6), wheelchair basketball (WB, n = 13), wheelchair fencing (WF, n = 6), and wheelchair tennis (WT, n = 4); and 2) to examine the relationship between field test performance and laboratory measures of aerobic fitness of these Paralympic athletes. Methods: Each athlete completed an incremental arm cranking exercise test to determine ventilatory threshold (VT) and peak oxygen uptake ((V) over dotO(2peak)). Subsequently, field assessments were carried out using a telemetric system to measure the cardiorespiratory responses in their respective sport. Results: VT and (V) over dotO(2peak) (both expressed in milliliters per kilogram per minute) of athletes competing in NS (38.3 +/- 5.76 and 51.0 +/- 6.92 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) and WR (35.5 +/- 5.96 and 48.1 +/- 6.35 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those competing in WB (26.0 +/- 2.13 and 36.9 +/- 3.70 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)), WF (23.2 +/- 3.96 and 34.4 +/- 5.81 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)), and WT (24.0 +/- 2.30 and 33.1 +/- 2.85 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)). In the field tests, the average (V) over dotO(2), higher in NS and WR than in WB, WF, and WT, during NS, WR, WB, WF, and WT was 79.4% +/- 3.30%, 84.4% +/- 2.10%, 72.1% +/- 5.72%, 73.0% +/- 3.10%, and 73.0% +/- 1.91%, respectively, of (V) over dotO(2peak). There was a strong linear relationship between (V) over dotO(2) measured during the field tests and VT and (V) over dotO(2peak) (R(2) = 0.92 in each case). Conclusions: Athletes regulated their average work intensity during the field tests in the five Paralympic sports to approximate their individualized VT measured during incremental arm cranking exercise test, and this intensity was within the range recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in well-trained subjects. In addition, performance of Paralympic athletes in these sports was highly dependent upon athletes' aerobic fitness.

Field Evaluation of Paralympic Athletes in Selected Sports: Implications for Training / Bernardi, Marco; E., Guerra; B., Di Giacinto; A., Di Cesare; V., Castellano; Y., Bhambhani. - In: MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE. - ISSN 0195-9131. - STAMPA. - 42:6(2010), pp. 1200-1208. [10.1249/mss.0b013e3181c67d82]

Field Evaluation of Paralympic Athletes in Selected Sports: Implications for Training

BERNARDI, Marco;
2010

Abstract

BERNARDI, M., E. GUERRA, B. DI GIACINTO, A. DI CESARE, V. CASTELLANO, and Y. BHAMBHANI. Field Evaluation of Paralympic Athletes in Selected Sports: Implications for Training. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 1200-1208, 2010. Purpose: The purpose of this study was 1) to describe the acute cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses of Paralympic athletes participating in the following five sports: Nordic sit skiing (NS, n = 5), wheelchair distance racing (WR, n = 6), wheelchair basketball (WB, n = 13), wheelchair fencing (WF, n = 6), and wheelchair tennis (WT, n = 4); and 2) to examine the relationship between field test performance and laboratory measures of aerobic fitness of these Paralympic athletes. Methods: Each athlete completed an incremental arm cranking exercise test to determine ventilatory threshold (VT) and peak oxygen uptake ((V) over dotO(2peak)). Subsequently, field assessments were carried out using a telemetric system to measure the cardiorespiratory responses in their respective sport. Results: VT and (V) over dotO(2peak) (both expressed in milliliters per kilogram per minute) of athletes competing in NS (38.3 +/- 5.76 and 51.0 +/- 6.92 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) and WR (35.5 +/- 5.96 and 48.1 +/- 6.35 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those competing in WB (26.0 +/- 2.13 and 36.9 +/- 3.70 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)), WF (23.2 +/- 3.96 and 34.4 +/- 5.81 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)), and WT (24.0 +/- 2.30 and 33.1 +/- 2.85 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)). In the field tests, the average (V) over dotO(2), higher in NS and WR than in WB, WF, and WT, during NS, WR, WB, WF, and WT was 79.4% +/- 3.30%, 84.4% +/- 2.10%, 72.1% +/- 5.72%, 73.0% +/- 3.10%, and 73.0% +/- 1.91%, respectively, of (V) over dotO(2peak). There was a strong linear relationship between (V) over dotO(2) measured during the field tests and VT and (V) over dotO(2peak) (R(2) = 0.92 in each case). Conclusions: Athletes regulated their average work intensity during the field tests in the five Paralympic sports to approximate their individualized VT measured during incremental arm cranking exercise test, and this intensity was within the range recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine to improve cardiorespiratory fitness in well-trained subjects. In addition, performance of Paralympic athletes in these sports was highly dependent upon athletes' aerobic fitness.
2010
aerobic fitness.; aerobic fitness; intermittent and continuous sports; disability sport; exercise intensity; cardiorespiratory responses
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Field Evaluation of Paralympic Athletes in Selected Sports: Implications for Training / Bernardi, Marco; E., Guerra; B., Di Giacinto; A., Di Cesare; V., Castellano; Y., Bhambhani. - In: MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE. - ISSN 0195-9131. - STAMPA. - 42:6(2010), pp. 1200-1208. [10.1249/mss.0b013e3181c67d82]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/50100
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 25
  • Scopus 87
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 71
social impact