This paper utilizes a thought experiment conducted by the Bank of Italy to estimate absolute and relative risk aversion along with absolute and relative prudence for a broad cross-section of Italian households. Upper and lower bounds are calculated for each parameter, and comparisons are made across socio-demographic groups. Evidence is found of decreasing absolute risk aversion, decreasing absolute prudence, increasing relative risk aversion, and increasing relative prudence.

Survey measures of risk aversion and prudence / Eisenhauer, Joseph G.; Ventura, Luigi. - In: APPLIED ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0003-6846. - 35:13(2003), pp. 1477-1484. [10.1080/0003684032000151287]

Survey measures of risk aversion and prudence

Ventura, Luigi
2003

Abstract

This paper utilizes a thought experiment conducted by the Bank of Italy to estimate absolute and relative risk aversion along with absolute and relative prudence for a broad cross-section of Italian households. Upper and lower bounds are calculated for each parameter, and comparisons are made across socio-demographic groups. Evidence is found of decreasing absolute risk aversion, decreasing absolute prudence, increasing relative risk aversion, and increasing relative prudence.
2003
risk aversion; prudence; thought experiment
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Survey measures of risk aversion and prudence / Eisenhauer, Joseph G.; Ventura, Luigi. - In: APPLIED ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0003-6846. - 35:13(2003), pp. 1477-1484. [10.1080/0003684032000151287]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Eisenhauer_Survey_2003.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 97.95 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
97.95 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/49906
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 51
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 38
social impact