The Cole-Cole model is considered the most reliable fitting tool to describe tissue dielectric properties, but it is not adequate for efficient numerical computation of electromagnetic fields (EMF). On the contrary the Debye model permits very fast computation, but it is not adequate to describe the tissue dispersion in the whole frequency spectrum. In this work we demonstrate that for a large class of actual wideband sources, the Debye model is accurate enough by retaining fast and efficient EMF calculations. © 2012 IEEE.
Cole-Cole vs Debye models for the assessment of electromagnetic fields inside biological tissues produced by wideband EMF sources / Cruciani, S.; De Santis, V.; Feliziani, M.; Maradei, Francescaromana. - STAMPA. - (2012), pp. 685-688. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2012 Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, APEMC 2012 tenutosi a Singapore nel 21 May 2012 through 24 May 2012) [10.1109/apemc.2012.6237915].
Cole-Cole vs Debye models for the assessment of electromagnetic fields inside biological tissues produced by wideband EMF sources
S. Cruciani;MARADEI, Francescaromana
2012
Abstract
The Cole-Cole model is considered the most reliable fitting tool to describe tissue dielectric properties, but it is not adequate for efficient numerical computation of electromagnetic fields (EMF). On the contrary the Debye model permits very fast computation, but it is not adequate to describe the tissue dispersion in the whole frequency spectrum. In this work we demonstrate that for a large class of actual wideband sources, the Debye model is accurate enough by retaining fast and efficient EMF calculations. © 2012 IEEE.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
