Objectives: The relationship between the dose, volume, and concentration of local anesthetic and the quality and success of regional anesthesia remains unclear. Our aim was to test whether using 3 different volumes of the same local anesthetic dose influences the success rate of an axillary brachial plexus block with a multiple-injection technique in patients undergoing upper limb surgery. Methods: One hundred sixty-five patients were prospectively randomized to 1 of 3 groups. Each group received an axillary block with mepivacaine 400 mg, diluted in 3 different volumes (20, 30, and 40 mL). Outcome measures recorded were the block success rate at 30 mins, sensory and motor onset times, and length of postoperative sensory and motor blockade. Results: No difference was found in the rate of successful axillary plexus blocks determined when the 30-min follow-up ended among the 3 groups: 94% for 20-mL volume, 94% for 30-mL volume, and 98% for 40-mL volume. The median sensory and motor onset times of anesthesia did not differ. However, postoperative motor blockade and sensory analgesia lasted significantly longer in the patients receiving mepivacaine 400 mg diluted in a volume of 30 mL than in the other groups. Conclusions: An axillary brachial plexus block induced with a multiple-injection technique with mepivacaine 400 mg yields a high success rate regardless of the volume of anesthetic injected.

Does local anesthetic dilution influence the clinical effectiveness of multiple-injection axillary brachial plexus block? A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial in patients undergoing upper limb surgery / Laura, Bertini; Stefano, Palmisani; Stefania, Mancini; Ornella, Martini; Rossana, Ioculano; Arcioni, Roberto. - STAMPA. - 34:5(2009), pp. 408-413.

Does local anesthetic dilution influence the clinical effectiveness of multiple-injection axillary brachial plexus block? A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial in patients undergoing upper limb surgery

ARCIONI, Roberto
2009

Abstract

Objectives: The relationship between the dose, volume, and concentration of local anesthetic and the quality and success of regional anesthesia remains unclear. Our aim was to test whether using 3 different volumes of the same local anesthetic dose influences the success rate of an axillary brachial plexus block with a multiple-injection technique in patients undergoing upper limb surgery. Methods: One hundred sixty-five patients were prospectively randomized to 1 of 3 groups. Each group received an axillary block with mepivacaine 400 mg, diluted in 3 different volumes (20, 30, and 40 mL). Outcome measures recorded were the block success rate at 30 mins, sensory and motor onset times, and length of postoperative sensory and motor blockade. Results: No difference was found in the rate of successful axillary plexus blocks determined when the 30-min follow-up ended among the 3 groups: 94% for 20-mL volume, 94% for 30-mL volume, and 98% for 40-mL volume. The median sensory and motor onset times of anesthesia did not differ. However, postoperative motor blockade and sensory analgesia lasted significantly longer in the patients receiving mepivacaine 400 mg diluted in a volume of 30 mL than in the other groups. Conclusions: An axillary brachial plexus block induced with a multiple-injection technique with mepivacaine 400 mg yields a high success rate regardless of the volume of anesthetic injected.
2009
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Does local anesthetic dilution influence the clinical effectiveness of multiple-injection axillary brachial plexus block? A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial in patients undergoing upper limb surgery / Laura, Bertini; Stefano, Palmisani; Stefania, Mancini; Ornella, Martini; Rossana, Ioculano; Arcioni, Roberto. - STAMPA. - 34:5(2009), pp. 408-413.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/495265
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact