We investigated patterns of resource partitioning between two brackish crustaceans (I. baltica and G. insensibilis) on trophic mosaics of fungal species colonizing vegetal detritus. Laboratory feeding experiments were carried out to assess consumption rates and diet selection of single individuals belonging to five populations. Adults of two co-occurring population of both G. insensibilis and I. baltica and one population of G. insensibilis, occurring alone in another habitat patch, were studied. Each individual were offered both fragments of Cymodocea nodosa conditioned by 8 fungal species and sterilized fragments as sole food source for 7 days. Both species preferred 'conditioned' detritus but potential resource use was greater in G. insensibilis than in I. baltica. Individual niche breadth increased and phenotypic variability reduced in the allotopic sample. Trophic similarities were lower between individuals of co-occurring populations than between I. baltica and the allotopic G. insensibilis. The results suggest that co-occurrence is an important factor contributing to the enhancement of phenotypic variability and, consequently, to a trophic generalization at population level in G. insensibilis. It emphasizes the role of fungal patchiness on detritus in regulating resource partitioning between the two species.

Role of fungal patchiness on vegetal detritus in the trophic interactions between two brackish detritivores, Idotea baltica and Gammarus insensibilis / Costantini, Maria Letizia; Rossi, Loreto. - In: HYDROBIOLOGIA. - ISSN 0018-8158. - STAMPA. - 316:2(1995), pp. 117-126. [10.1007/bf00016893]

Role of fungal patchiness on vegetal detritus in the trophic interactions between two brackish detritivores, Idotea baltica and Gammarus insensibilis

COSTANTINI, Maria Letizia;ROSSI, Loreto
1995

Abstract

We investigated patterns of resource partitioning between two brackish crustaceans (I. baltica and G. insensibilis) on trophic mosaics of fungal species colonizing vegetal detritus. Laboratory feeding experiments were carried out to assess consumption rates and diet selection of single individuals belonging to five populations. Adults of two co-occurring population of both G. insensibilis and I. baltica and one population of G. insensibilis, occurring alone in another habitat patch, were studied. Each individual were offered both fragments of Cymodocea nodosa conditioned by 8 fungal species and sterilized fragments as sole food source for 7 days. Both species preferred 'conditioned' detritus but potential resource use was greater in G. insensibilis than in I. baltica. Individual niche breadth increased and phenotypic variability reduced in the allotopic sample. Trophic similarities were lower between individuals of co-occurring populations than between I. baltica and the allotopic G. insensibilis. The results suggest that co-occurrence is an important factor contributing to the enhancement of phenotypic variability and, consequently, to a trophic generalization at population level in G. insensibilis. It emphasizes the role of fungal patchiness on detritus in regulating resource partitioning between the two species.
1995
benthic invertebrates; brackish pond; coevolution; detritus; trophic niche
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Role of fungal patchiness on vegetal detritus in the trophic interactions between two brackish detritivores, Idotea baltica and Gammarus insensibilis / Costantini, Maria Letizia; Rossi, Loreto. - In: HYDROBIOLOGIA. - ISSN 0018-8158. - STAMPA. - 316:2(1995), pp. 117-126. [10.1007/bf00016893]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/490791
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact