Context: The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on urinary incontinence published in March 2012 have been rewritten based on an independent systematic review carried out by the EAU guidelines panel using a sustainable methodology. Objective: We present a short version here of the full guidelines on the surgical treatment of patients with urinary incontinence, with the aim of dissemination to a wider audience. Evidence acquisition: Evidence appraisal included a pragmatic review of existing systematic reviews and independent new literature searches based on Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions. The appraisal of papers was carried out by an international panel of experts, who also collaborated in a series of consensus discussions, to develop concise structured evidence summaries and action-based recommendations using a modified Oxford system. Evidence summary: The full version of the guidance is available online (www.uroweb.org/guidelines/online-guidelines/). The guidance includes algorithms that refer the reader back to the supporting evidence and have greater accessibility in daily clinical practice. Two original meta-analyses were carried out specifically for these guidelines and are included in this report. Conclusions: These new guidelines present an up-to-date summary of the available evidence, together with clear clinical algorithms and action-based recommendations based on the best available evidence. Where high-level evidence is lacking, they present a consensus of expert panel opinion. © 2012 European Association of Urology.

EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence / Malcolm G., Lucas; Ruud J. L., Bosch; Fiona C., Burkhard; Francisco, Cruz; Thomas B., Madden; Arjun K., Nambiar; Andreas, Neisius; Dirk J. M. K., De Ridder; Tubaro, Andrea; William H., Turner; Robert S., Pickard. - In: EUROPEAN UROLOGY. - ISSN 1873-7560. - STAMPA. - 62:6(2012), pp. 1118-1129. [10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.023]

EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence

TUBARO, ANDREA;
2012

Abstract

Context: The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on urinary incontinence published in March 2012 have been rewritten based on an independent systematic review carried out by the EAU guidelines panel using a sustainable methodology. Objective: We present a short version here of the full guidelines on the surgical treatment of patients with urinary incontinence, with the aim of dissemination to a wider audience. Evidence acquisition: Evidence appraisal included a pragmatic review of existing systematic reviews and independent new literature searches based on Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions. The appraisal of papers was carried out by an international panel of experts, who also collaborated in a series of consensus discussions, to develop concise structured evidence summaries and action-based recommendations using a modified Oxford system. Evidence summary: The full version of the guidance is available online (www.uroweb.org/guidelines/online-guidelines/). The guidance includes algorithms that refer the reader back to the supporting evidence and have greater accessibility in daily clinical practice. Two original meta-analyses were carried out specifically for these guidelines and are included in this report. Conclusions: These new guidelines present an up-to-date summary of the available evidence, together with clear clinical algorithms and action-based recommendations based on the best available evidence. Where high-level evidence is lacking, they present a consensus of expert panel opinion. © 2012 European Association of Urology.
2012
practice-based; botulinum toxin a; mixed urinary incontinence; eau guidelines; stress urinary incontinence; slings; surgical treatment; colposuspension; urge urinary incontinence; compression devices; urinary incontinence; cystoplasty; bulking agents; sacral nerve stimulation
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence / Malcolm G., Lucas; Ruud J. L., Bosch; Fiona C., Burkhard; Francisco, Cruz; Thomas B., Madden; Arjun K., Nambiar; Andreas, Neisius; Dirk J. M. K., De Ridder; Tubaro, Andrea; William H., Turner; Robert S., Pickard. - In: EUROPEAN UROLOGY. - ISSN 1873-7560. - STAMPA. - 62:6(2012), pp. 1118-1129. [10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.023]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/485815
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 30
  • Scopus 194
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 231
social impact