Codecision is the main European Union legislative procedure and the 2007 Reform Treaty draft has adopted it to improve the budgetary process. However, at close examination, codecision and the current budgetary process show an identical structure. Both are designed as non-cooperative alternating offers bargaining games between institutions and both, although in different measure, have gone through periods of interinstitutional deadlocks and conflicts, which can be ascribed to the insufficiency of the non-cooperative bargaining setup with respect to the task of providing for joint-decision making by the Parliament and the Council of Ministers: in particular, the opportunistic interpretation of the Treaty provisions by the Parliament in the 1980s was one of the consequences of the strict bargaining design. The article argues that the lacking elements for joint decision making have been gradually inserted in the procedures by means of informal negotiation institutions, which are not only mechanisms for equilibrium selection but also corrective devices to strict non-cooperative procedures. Informal institutions will play a fundamental role also in the change from the current budgetary procedure to the one designed in the 2007 Reform Treaty, where the Parliament does not seem to gain a 'dominant position', the Commission improves its scope for action and the Council consolidates its role. (JEL codes: D73, D78, H77)

Reforming the EU budgetary procedure. Is codecision a step forward? / Giuriato, Luisa. - In: CESIFO ECONOMIC STUDIES. - ISSN 1610-241X. - 55:1(2009), pp. 57-93. [10.1093/cesifo/ifn034]

Reforming the EU budgetary procedure. Is codecision a step forward?

GIURIATO, Luisa
2009

Abstract

Codecision is the main European Union legislative procedure and the 2007 Reform Treaty draft has adopted it to improve the budgetary process. However, at close examination, codecision and the current budgetary process show an identical structure. Both are designed as non-cooperative alternating offers bargaining games between institutions and both, although in different measure, have gone through periods of interinstitutional deadlocks and conflicts, which can be ascribed to the insufficiency of the non-cooperative bargaining setup with respect to the task of providing for joint-decision making by the Parliament and the Council of Ministers: in particular, the opportunistic interpretation of the Treaty provisions by the Parliament in the 1980s was one of the consequences of the strict bargaining design. The article argues that the lacking elements for joint decision making have been gradually inserted in the procedures by means of informal negotiation institutions, which are not only mechanisms for equilibrium selection but also corrective devices to strict non-cooperative procedures. Informal institutions will play a fundamental role also in the change from the current budgetary procedure to the one designed in the 2007 Reform Treaty, where the Parliament does not seem to gain a 'dominant position', the Commission improves its scope for action and the Council consolidates its role. (JEL codes: D73, D78, H77)
2009
eu finances; budgetary procedure; 2007 reform treaty; codecision; european union; legislative codecision; informal institutions; eu treaty reform
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Reforming the EU budgetary procedure. Is codecision a step forward? / Giuriato, Luisa. - In: CESIFO ECONOMIC STUDIES. - ISSN 1610-241X. - 55:1(2009), pp. 57-93. [10.1093/cesifo/ifn034]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Giuriato_Reforming_2009.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 233.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
233.16 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/48429
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact