Carotid stenting is a safe alternative option to conventional carotid endarterectomy in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in patients considered poor candidates for surgery or who choose not to have open surgery. During the stenting procedure, however, distal embolization may occur with neurological sequelae. To reduce the incidence of this, several cerebral-protection devices (CPDs) have been developed. Different types of CPDs are now commercially available: distal occlusion balloons, distal filters, and proximal protection devices-+ with or without reversal of flow. But complications can occur with their use and are usually associated with an inability to cross the lesion, failure to capture the emboli, vasospasm, and vessel wall injury. Because protection devices are currently the focus of interest by manufacturers and physicians, several trials are going on worldwide to analyze the characteristics of each of them and to evaluate their efficacy in reducing the rate of distal embolization. Copyright © 2007 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

Carotid intervention 3: The evidence for cerebral protection / Fabrizio, Fanelli; Bezzi, Mario; Boatta, Emanuele; Passariello, Roberto. - In: SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0739-9529. - STAMPA. - 24:2(2007), pp. 234-243. [10.1055/s-2007-980046]

Carotid intervention 3: The evidence for cerebral protection

BEZZI, Mario;BOATTA, EMANUELE;PASSARIELLO, Roberto
2007

Abstract

Carotid stenting is a safe alternative option to conventional carotid endarterectomy in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in patients considered poor candidates for surgery or who choose not to have open surgery. During the stenting procedure, however, distal embolization may occur with neurological sequelae. To reduce the incidence of this, several cerebral-protection devices (CPDs) have been developed. Different types of CPDs are now commercially available: distal occlusion balloons, distal filters, and proximal protection devices-+ with or without reversal of flow. But complications can occur with their use and are usually associated with an inability to cross the lesion, failure to capture the emboli, vasospasm, and vessel wall injury. Because protection devices are currently the focus of interest by manufacturers and physicians, several trials are going on worldwide to analyze the characteristics of each of them and to evaluate their efficacy in reducing the rate of distal embolization. Copyright © 2007 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
2007
balloon occlusion; carotid stenting; cerebral embolization; filters; flow reversal
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Carotid intervention 3: The evidence for cerebral protection / Fabrizio, Fanelli; Bezzi, Mario; Boatta, Emanuele; Passariello, Roberto. - In: SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0739-9529. - STAMPA. - 24:2(2007), pp. 234-243. [10.1055/s-2007-980046]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/483271
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact