Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is a valid anticoagulation method in continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) and different combination of citrate and CRRT solutions can affect acid-base balance. Regardless of the anticoagulation protocol, hypophosphatemia occurs frequently in CRRT. In this case report, we evaluated safety and effects on acid-base balance of a new RCA- continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) protocol using an 18mmol/L citrate solution combined with a phosphate-containing replacement fluid. In our center, RCA-CVVH is routinely performed with a 12mmol/L citrate solution and a postdilution replacement fluid with bicarbonate (protocol A). In case of persistent acidosis, not related to citrate accumulation, bicarbonate infusion is scheduled. In order to optimize buffers balance, a new protocol has been designed using recently introduced solutions: 18mmol/L citrate solution, phosphate-containing postdilution replacement fluid with bicarbonate (protocol B). In a cardiac surgery patient with acute kidney injury, acid-base status and electrolytes have been evaluated comparing protocol A (five circuits, 301hours) vs. protocol B (two circuits, 97hours): pH7.39 +/- 0.03 vs. 7.44 +/- 0.03 (P<0.0001), bicarbonate 22.3 +/- 1.8 vs. 22.6 +/- 1.4mmol/L (NS), Base excess 2.8 +/- 2.1 vs. 1.6 +/- 1.2 (P=0.007), phosphate 0.85 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.5mmol/L (P=0.027). Protocol A required bicarbonate and sodium phosphate infusion (8.9 +/- 2.8mmol/h and 5g/day, respectively) while protocol B allowed to stop both supplementations. In comparison to protocol A, protocol B allowed to adequately control acid-base status without additional bicarbonate infusion and in absence of alkalosis, despite the use of a standard bicarbonate concentration replacement solution. Furthermore, the combination of a phosphate-containing replacement fluid appeared effective to prevent hypophosphatemia.
Regional citrate anticoagulation in CVVH: A new protocol combining citrate solution with a phosphate-containing replacement fluid / Santo, Morabito; Pistolesi, Valentina; Tritapepe, Luigi; Zeppilli, Laura; Polistena, Francesca; Enrico, Fiaccadori; Pierucci, Alessandro. - In: HEMODIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL. - ISSN 1492-7535. - STAMPA. - 17:2(2013), pp. 313-320. [10.1111/j.1542-4758.2012.00730.x]
Regional citrate anticoagulation in CVVH: A new protocol combining citrate solution with a phosphate-containing replacement fluid
PISTOLESI, VALENTINA;TRITAPEPE, Luigi;ZEPPILLI, LAURA;POLISTENA, FRANCESCA;PIERUCCI, Alessandro
2013
Abstract
Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is a valid anticoagulation method in continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) and different combination of citrate and CRRT solutions can affect acid-base balance. Regardless of the anticoagulation protocol, hypophosphatemia occurs frequently in CRRT. In this case report, we evaluated safety and effects on acid-base balance of a new RCA- continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) protocol using an 18mmol/L citrate solution combined with a phosphate-containing replacement fluid. In our center, RCA-CVVH is routinely performed with a 12mmol/L citrate solution and a postdilution replacement fluid with bicarbonate (protocol A). In case of persistent acidosis, not related to citrate accumulation, bicarbonate infusion is scheduled. In order to optimize buffers balance, a new protocol has been designed using recently introduced solutions: 18mmol/L citrate solution, phosphate-containing postdilution replacement fluid with bicarbonate (protocol B). In a cardiac surgery patient with acute kidney injury, acid-base status and electrolytes have been evaluated comparing protocol A (five circuits, 301hours) vs. protocol B (two circuits, 97hours): pH7.39 +/- 0.03 vs. 7.44 +/- 0.03 (P<0.0001), bicarbonate 22.3 +/- 1.8 vs. 22.6 +/- 1.4mmol/L (NS), Base excess 2.8 +/- 2.1 vs. 1.6 +/- 1.2 (P=0.007), phosphate 0.85 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.5mmol/L (P=0.027). Protocol A required bicarbonate and sodium phosphate infusion (8.9 +/- 2.8mmol/h and 5g/day, respectively) while protocol B allowed to stop both supplementations. In comparison to protocol A, protocol B allowed to adequately control acid-base status without additional bicarbonate infusion and in absence of alkalosis, despite the use of a standard bicarbonate concentration replacement solution. Furthermore, the combination of a phosphate-containing replacement fluid appeared effective to prevent hypophosphatemia.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.