Many work activities include hazards to workers, and among these biological risk is particularly important, mostly because of different types of exposure, contact with highly dangerous agents, lack of limit values able to compare all exposures, presence of workers with defective immune systems and therefore more susceptible to the risk. Bioaerosols and dust are considered important vehicles of microganisms at workplaces and interaction with other occupational agents is assumed. Moreover, biological risk can be significant in countries with increasing economic development or particular habits and some biological agents are also classified as carcinogenic to human. Specific emerging biological risks have been recently pointed out by Risk Observatory of the European Agency for Safety and Health at work, and we must consider the worker's attitude and behaviour, influenced by his own perception of risk more than his real knowledge, that could over-underestimate the risk itself. Therefore, biological risk at work requires a complex approach in relation to risk assessment and risk management, made more difficult due to the wide variety of biological agents, working environments and working techniques that can determine the exposures. © 2012 National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health.

Biological risk and occupational Health / Corrao, Carmela Romana Natalina; Adele, Mazzotta; LA TORRE, Giuseppe; DE GIUSTI, Maria. - In: INDUSTRIAL HEALTH. - ISSN 0019-8366. - STAMPA. - 50:4(2012), pp. 326-337. [10.2486/indhealth.ms1324]

Biological risk and occupational Health

CORRAO, Carmela Romana Natalina;LA TORRE, Giuseppe;DE GIUSTI, Maria
2012

Abstract

Many work activities include hazards to workers, and among these biological risk is particularly important, mostly because of different types of exposure, contact with highly dangerous agents, lack of limit values able to compare all exposures, presence of workers with defective immune systems and therefore more susceptible to the risk. Bioaerosols and dust are considered important vehicles of microganisms at workplaces and interaction with other occupational agents is assumed. Moreover, biological risk can be significant in countries with increasing economic development or particular habits and some biological agents are also classified as carcinogenic to human. Specific emerging biological risks have been recently pointed out by Risk Observatory of the European Agency for Safety and Health at work, and we must consider the worker's attitude and behaviour, influenced by his own perception of risk more than his real knowledge, that could over-underestimate the risk itself. Therefore, biological risk at work requires a complex approach in relation to risk assessment and risk management, made more difficult due to the wide variety of biological agents, working environments and working techniques that can determine the exposures. © 2012 National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health.
biological risk; occupational medicine; risk assessment; risk perception; workplaces
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Biological risk and occupational Health / Corrao, Carmela Romana Natalina; Adele, Mazzotta; LA TORRE, Giuseppe; DE GIUSTI, Maria. - In: INDUSTRIAL HEALTH. - ISSN 0019-8366. - STAMPA. - 50:4(2012), pp. 326-337. [10.2486/indhealth.ms1324]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
advpub_MS1324-1.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 507.49 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
507.49 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/470131
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 17
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 33
social impact