The effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus AT195, a potential probiotic microorganism cultured in buffalo “scotta” whey, on chemical and microbiological composition in maize and sorghum ensiling were evaluated. Both crops were harvested, chopped, and treated or not with the selected strain prior to ensiling in fiberglass vertical silos; 90 days after ensiling, silages were sensorially evaluated and sampled. Different chemical components were evaluated both on fresh crops and silages: in particular, the water-soluble carbohydrates content was investigated by high-field NMR spectroscopy and the carbohydrate fermentation profile was performed by GC. Besides phenotypic identification and typing, microbiological studies included Lb. rhamnosus genotype typing by RAPD-PCR. All silages, inoculated or not, were well preserved, as their chemical and microbiological data along with the fermentation profiles showed. The selected strain used as inoculum influenced the lactic acid population of silages and evidenced a good survival performance during the ensiling process of both maize and sorghum. Moreover, the use of Lb. rhamnosus strain efficiently improved the quality of the multifactorial ensiling process by significantly reducing the ammonia nitrogen content of both maize and sorghum silages

Lactobacillus rhamnosus as additive for maize and sorghum ensiling / Elisabetta, Salimei; Valeria, Capilongo; Andrea, Simoni; Pier Giorgio, Peiretti; Cristina, Maglieri; Cristina A., Romano; Mannina, Luisa; Raffaele, Coppola; Elena, Sorrentino. - In: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY. - ISSN 0021-8561. - ELETTRONICO. - 55:23(2007), pp. 9600-9607. [10.1021/jf071775v]

Lactobacillus rhamnosus as additive for maize and sorghum ensiling

MANNINA, LUISA;
2007

Abstract

The effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus AT195, a potential probiotic microorganism cultured in buffalo “scotta” whey, on chemical and microbiological composition in maize and sorghum ensiling were evaluated. Both crops were harvested, chopped, and treated or not with the selected strain prior to ensiling in fiberglass vertical silos; 90 days after ensiling, silages were sensorially evaluated and sampled. Different chemical components were evaluated both on fresh crops and silages: in particular, the water-soluble carbohydrates content was investigated by high-field NMR spectroscopy and the carbohydrate fermentation profile was performed by GC. Besides phenotypic identification and typing, microbiological studies included Lb. rhamnosus genotype typing by RAPD-PCR. All silages, inoculated or not, were well preserved, as their chemical and microbiological data along with the fermentation profiles showed. The selected strain used as inoculum influenced the lactic acid population of silages and evidenced a good survival performance during the ensiling process of both maize and sorghum. Moreover, the use of Lb. rhamnosus strain efficiently improved the quality of the multifactorial ensiling process by significantly reducing the ammonia nitrogen content of both maize and sorghum silages
2007
feed additives; lactic acid bacteria; lactobacillus rhamnosus; silage
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Lactobacillus rhamnosus as additive for maize and sorghum ensiling / Elisabetta, Salimei; Valeria, Capilongo; Andrea, Simoni; Pier Giorgio, Peiretti; Cristina, Maglieri; Cristina A., Romano; Mannina, Luisa; Raffaele, Coppola; Elena, Sorrentino. - In: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY. - ISSN 0021-8561. - ELETTRONICO. - 55:23(2007), pp. 9600-9607. [10.1021/jf071775v]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/46309
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact