One the main reasons for the limited use of MRI in the evaluation of aortic dissection in emergency conditions is its long execution time. The authors report their experience regarding a new MRI sequence that reduces execution time and avoids the use of contrast medium.Eighteen haemodynamically stable patients with suspected (16 cases, 3 with confirmed diagnosis of aneurysm) or known aortic dissection (2 cases) underwent in emergency conditions 1.5T MRI with Steady-State sequence (Fast Imaging Employing Steady-State Acquisition: GRE 2D; TR 3.5, TE 1.6; Flip Angle 45, bandwidth 125, matrix 224x224, NEX 1, acquisition time per slice 7 s, thickness 6-8 mm, FOV 38; 2D-GE breath-hold sequence requiring cardiac triggering). The results obtained were compared in terms of diagnostic accuracy and execution time with those of classical MRI examination (black blood T1, FSE T2 and 3D MR-angiography) or multislice CT.The diagnostic accuracy of MRI, both with Steady-State sequence and the ''classical'' technique, and multislice CT in the diagnosis of dissection or aneurysm is equal (100\%), whereas execution time is 6, 25 and 6 minutes, respectively. Multislice CT proved to be more accurate than Steady-State MRI in evaluating the renal parenchyma and the extension of the dissection to the renal arteries.The Steady-State MRI sequence provides a diagnosis of aortic dissection or aneurysmal dilatation in a short time and may represent a valuable alternative to CT in emergency settings, especially in patients with reported contraindications to iodinated contrast media.
Steady state evaluation of aortic dissections: A feasibility study / M. L., De; C., Andreoli; E., Casciani; E., Polettini; Gualdi, Gianfranco. - In: LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA. - ISSN 0033-8362. - 110:(2005), pp. 523-531.
Steady state evaluation of aortic dissections: A feasibility study.
GUALDI, GIANFRANCO
2005
Abstract
One the main reasons for the limited use of MRI in the evaluation of aortic dissection in emergency conditions is its long execution time. The authors report their experience regarding a new MRI sequence that reduces execution time and avoids the use of contrast medium.Eighteen haemodynamically stable patients with suspected (16 cases, 3 with confirmed diagnosis of aneurysm) or known aortic dissection (2 cases) underwent in emergency conditions 1.5T MRI with Steady-State sequence (Fast Imaging Employing Steady-State Acquisition: GRE 2D; TR 3.5, TE 1.6; Flip Angle 45, bandwidth 125, matrix 224x224, NEX 1, acquisition time per slice 7 s, thickness 6-8 mm, FOV 38; 2D-GE breath-hold sequence requiring cardiac triggering). The results obtained were compared in terms of diagnostic accuracy and execution time with those of classical MRI examination (black blood T1, FSE T2 and 3D MR-angiography) or multislice CT.The diagnostic accuracy of MRI, both with Steady-State sequence and the ''classical'' technique, and multislice CT in the diagnosis of dissection or aneurysm is equal (100\%), whereas execution time is 6, 25 and 6 minutes, respectively. Multislice CT proved to be more accurate than Steady-State MRI in evaluating the renal parenchyma and the extension of the dissection to the renal arteries.The Steady-State MRI sequence provides a diagnosis of aortic dissection or aneurysmal dilatation in a short time and may represent a valuable alternative to CT in emergency settings, especially in patients with reported contraindications to iodinated contrast media.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.