Routine drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still debatable. The present study was designed to assess the role of drains in laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed for nonacutely inflamed gallbladder. After laparoscopic gallbladder removal, 53 patients were randomized to have a suction drain positioned in the subhepatic space and 53 patients to have a sham drain. The primary outcome measure was the presence of subhepatic fluid collection at abdominal ultrasonography, performed 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative abdominal and shoulder tip pain, use of analgesics, nausea, vomiting, and morbidity. Subhepatic fluid collection was not found in 45 patients (84.9 %) in group A and in 46 patients (86.8 %) in group B (difference 1.9 (95 % confidence interval -11.37 to 15.17; P = 0.998). No significant difference in visual analogue scale scores with respect to abdominal and shoulder pain, use of parenteral ketorolac, nausea, and vomiting were found in either group. Two (1.9 %) significant hemorrhagic events occurred postoperatively. Wound infection was observed in three patients (5.7 %) in group A and two patients (3.8 %) in group B (difference 1.9 (95 % CI -6.19 to 9.99; P = 0.997). The present study was unable to prove that the drain was useful in elective, uncomplicated LC.

Drain after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized multicentre controlled trial / Marcello, Picchio; DE ANGELIS, Francesco; Settimio, Zazza; DI FILIPPO, Annalisa Romina; Raffaello, Mancini; Pattaro, Giada; Francesco, Stipa; Adewale Oluseye, Adisa; Giuseppe, Marino; Spaziani, Erasmo. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - STAMPA. - 26:10(2012), pp. 2817-2822. [10.1007/s00464-012-2252-1]

Drain after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized multicentre controlled trial

DE ANGELIS, FRANCESCO;DI FILIPPO, Annalisa Romina;PATTARO, GIADA;SPAZIANI, Erasmo
2012

Abstract

Routine drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still debatable. The present study was designed to assess the role of drains in laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed for nonacutely inflamed gallbladder. After laparoscopic gallbladder removal, 53 patients were randomized to have a suction drain positioned in the subhepatic space and 53 patients to have a sham drain. The primary outcome measure was the presence of subhepatic fluid collection at abdominal ultrasonography, performed 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative abdominal and shoulder tip pain, use of analgesics, nausea, vomiting, and morbidity. Subhepatic fluid collection was not found in 45 patients (84.9 %) in group A and in 46 patients (86.8 %) in group B (difference 1.9 (95 % confidence interval -11.37 to 15.17; P = 0.998). No significant difference in visual analogue scale scores with respect to abdominal and shoulder pain, use of parenteral ketorolac, nausea, and vomiting were found in either group. Two (1.9 %) significant hemorrhagic events occurred postoperatively. Wound infection was observed in three patients (5.7 %) in group A and two patients (3.8 %) in group B (difference 1.9 (95 % CI -6.19 to 9.99; P = 0.997). The present study was unable to prove that the drain was useful in elective, uncomplicated LC.
2012
cholecystectomy; drainage; laparoscopy
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Drain after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized multicentre controlled trial / Marcello, Picchio; DE ANGELIS, Francesco; Settimio, Zazza; DI FILIPPO, Annalisa Romina; Raffaello, Mancini; Pattaro, Giada; Francesco, Stipa; Adewale Oluseye, Adisa; Giuseppe, Marino; Spaziani, Erasmo. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - STAMPA. - 26:10(2012), pp. 2817-2822. [10.1007/s00464-012-2252-1]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/453829
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 31
social impact