Different anesthesiological techniques are currently used for intragastric balloon positioning and removal. The aim of this study is to compare different anesthesiological approaches for balloon positioning and removal in a large multicentric patient population. Retrospective multicenter study was conducted. From May 2000 to April 2008, 3,824 patients underwent BIB(A (R)) placement [1,022 male/2,802 female; mean age 39.5 +/- A 14.7 years, range 12-71 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 44.8 +/- A 9.7 kg/m(2), range 28.0-79.1 kg/m(2); excess weight (EW) 59.1 +/- A 29.8 kg, range 16-210 kg; %EW 89.3 +/- A 31.7, range 21.4-262]. Patients were allocated to three groups according to anesthesiological technique used: conscious sedation (group A), deep sedation (group B), and general anesthesia (group C). Intragastric balloon was placed after diagnostic endoscopy and removed after 6 months. Both positioning and removal were done under different protocols. Conscious sedation was obtained with topical lidocaine spray, adding diazepam (0.05-0.1 mg/kg iv) or midazolam (0.03-0.05 mg/kg iv). Deep sedation was obtained with propofol alone or adding other drugs such as midazolam, meperidine/fentanyl or meperidine/fentanyl + midazolam. General anesthesia was obtained with midazolam premedication (0.01-0.02 mg/kg iv) followed by induction with propofol (1-1.5 mg/kg iv) + Norcuron (80 mcg/kg iv) + fentanyl (0.5-1 mcg/kg iv), and maintenance with propofol (50-150 mu g/kg/min) or sevorane. Oxygen saturation, hemodynamic stability, major anesthesiological complications and related mortality, patient satisfaction, time to return to autonomous walking, duration of procedure, and hospital stay were considered. Sedation-related mortality was absent. A significant number of patients with bronchoinhalation during balloon removal was observed with general anesthesia (P < 0.001). BIB positioning and removal should be performed under conscious sedation for patient safety and comfort, and technical success.

Intragastric balloon positioning and removal: sedation or general anesthesia? / Teresa, Messina; Genco, Alfredo; Favaro, Roberto; Maselli, Roberta; Fiore, Torchia; Francesco, Guidi; Roberto, Razza; Nadia, Aloi; Marco, Piattelli; Michele, Lorenzo. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - 25:12(2011), pp. 3811-3814. [10.1007/s00464-011-1794-y]

Intragastric balloon positioning and removal: sedation or general anesthesia?

GENCO, Alfredo;FAVARO, Roberto;MASELLI, ROBERTA;
2011

Abstract

Different anesthesiological techniques are currently used for intragastric balloon positioning and removal. The aim of this study is to compare different anesthesiological approaches for balloon positioning and removal in a large multicentric patient population. Retrospective multicenter study was conducted. From May 2000 to April 2008, 3,824 patients underwent BIB(A (R)) placement [1,022 male/2,802 female; mean age 39.5 +/- A 14.7 years, range 12-71 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 44.8 +/- A 9.7 kg/m(2), range 28.0-79.1 kg/m(2); excess weight (EW) 59.1 +/- A 29.8 kg, range 16-210 kg; %EW 89.3 +/- A 31.7, range 21.4-262]. Patients were allocated to three groups according to anesthesiological technique used: conscious sedation (group A), deep sedation (group B), and general anesthesia (group C). Intragastric balloon was placed after diagnostic endoscopy and removed after 6 months. Both positioning and removal were done under different protocols. Conscious sedation was obtained with topical lidocaine spray, adding diazepam (0.05-0.1 mg/kg iv) or midazolam (0.03-0.05 mg/kg iv). Deep sedation was obtained with propofol alone or adding other drugs such as midazolam, meperidine/fentanyl or meperidine/fentanyl + midazolam. General anesthesia was obtained with midazolam premedication (0.01-0.02 mg/kg iv) followed by induction with propofol (1-1.5 mg/kg iv) + Norcuron (80 mcg/kg iv) + fentanyl (0.5-1 mcg/kg iv), and maintenance with propofol (50-150 mu g/kg/min) or sevorane. Oxygen saturation, hemodynamic stability, major anesthesiological complications and related mortality, patient satisfaction, time to return to autonomous walking, duration of procedure, and hospital stay were considered. Sedation-related mortality was absent. A significant number of patients with bronchoinhalation during balloon removal was observed with general anesthesia (P < 0.001). BIB positioning and removal should be performed under conscious sedation for patient safety and comfort, and technical success.
2011
bib; conscious sedation; deep sedation; general anesthesia; intragastric balloon; morbid obese
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Intragastric balloon positioning and removal: sedation or general anesthesia? / Teresa, Messina; Genco, Alfredo; Favaro, Roberto; Maselli, Roberta; Fiore, Torchia; Francesco, Guidi; Roberto, Razza; Nadia, Aloi; Marco, Piattelli; Michele, Lorenzo. - In: SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0930-2794. - 25:12(2011), pp. 3811-3814. [10.1007/s00464-011-1794-y]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/447431
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact