Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an emerging surgical approach, but 1 that has seen a surge in popularity because of its perceived technical simplicity, feasibility, and good outcomes. An international expert panel was convened in Coral Gables, Florida on March 25 and 26, 2011, with the purpose of providing best practice guidelines through consensus regarding the performance of LSG. The panel comprised 24 centers and represented 11 countries, spanning all major regions of the world and all 6 populated continents, with a collective experience of >12,000 cases. It was thought prudent to hold an expert consensus meeting of some of the surgeons across the globe who have performed the largest volume of cases to discuss and provide consensus on the indications, contraindications, and procedural aspects of LSG. The panel undertook this consensus effort to help the surgical community improve the efficacy, lower the complication rates, and move toward adoption of standardized techniques and measures. The meeting took place at on-site meeting facilities, Biltmore Hotel, Coral Gables, Florida. Methods: Expert panelists were invited to participate according to their publications, knowledge and experience, and identification as surgeons who had performed >500 cases. The topics for consensus encompassed patient selection, contraindications, surgical technique, and the prevention and management of complications. The responses were calculated and defined as achieving consensus (>= 70% agreement) or no consensus (<70% agreement). Results: Full consensus was obtained for the essential aspects of the indications and contraindications, surgical technique, management, and prevention of complications. Consensus was achieved for 69 key questions. Conclusion: The present consensus report represents the best practice guidelines for the performance of LSG, with recommendations in the 3 aforementioned areas. This report and its findings support a first effort toward the standardization of techniques and adoption of working recommendations formulated according to expert experience. (Surg Obes Relat Dis 2012;8:8-19.) (C) 2012 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.

International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases / Raul J., Rosenthal; A. A., Diaz; D., Arvidsson; R. S., Baker; Basso, Nicola; D., Bellanger; C., Boza; H., El Mourad; M., France; M., Gagner; M., Galvao Neto; K. D., Higa; J., Himpens; C. M., Hutchinson; M., Jacobs; J. O., Jorgensen; G., Jossart; M., Lakdawala; N. T., Nguyen; D., Nocca; G., Prager; A., Pomp; A. C., Ramos; R. J., Rosenthal; S., Shah; M., Vix; A., Wittgrove; N., Zundel; International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert, Panel. - In: SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES. - ISSN 1550-7289. - 8:1(2012), pp. 8-19. [10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019]

International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases

BASSO, Nicola;
2012

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an emerging surgical approach, but 1 that has seen a surge in popularity because of its perceived technical simplicity, feasibility, and good outcomes. An international expert panel was convened in Coral Gables, Florida on March 25 and 26, 2011, with the purpose of providing best practice guidelines through consensus regarding the performance of LSG. The panel comprised 24 centers and represented 11 countries, spanning all major regions of the world and all 6 populated continents, with a collective experience of >12,000 cases. It was thought prudent to hold an expert consensus meeting of some of the surgeons across the globe who have performed the largest volume of cases to discuss and provide consensus on the indications, contraindications, and procedural aspects of LSG. The panel undertook this consensus effort to help the surgical community improve the efficacy, lower the complication rates, and move toward adoption of standardized techniques and measures. The meeting took place at on-site meeting facilities, Biltmore Hotel, Coral Gables, Florida. Methods: Expert panelists were invited to participate according to their publications, knowledge and experience, and identification as surgeons who had performed >500 cases. The topics for consensus encompassed patient selection, contraindications, surgical technique, and the prevention and management of complications. The responses were calculated and defined as achieving consensus (>= 70% agreement) or no consensus (<70% agreement). Results: Full consensus was obtained for the essential aspects of the indications and contraindications, surgical technique, management, and prevention of complications. Consensus was achieved for 69 key questions. Conclusion: The present consensus report represents the best practice guidelines for the performance of LSG, with recommendations in the 3 aforementioned areas. This report and its findings support a first effort toward the standardization of techniques and adoption of working recommendations formulated according to expert experience. (Surg Obes Relat Dis 2012;8:8-19.) (C) 2012 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.
2012
bariatric surgery; consensus statement; international sleeve gastrectomy expert panel; laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; morbid obesity; outcomes
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases / Raul J., Rosenthal; A. A., Diaz; D., Arvidsson; R. S., Baker; Basso, Nicola; D., Bellanger; C., Boza; H., El Mourad; M., France; M., Gagner; M., Galvao Neto; K. D., Higa; J., Himpens; C. M., Hutchinson; M., Jacobs; J. O., Jorgensen; G., Jossart; M., Lakdawala; N. T., Nguyen; D., Nocca; G., Prager; A., Pomp; A. C., Ramos; R. J., Rosenthal; S., Shah; M., Vix; A., Wittgrove; N., Zundel; International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert, Panel. - In: SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES. - ISSN 1550-7289. - 8:1(2012), pp. 8-19. [10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/443601
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 132
  • Scopus 758
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 703
social impact