Perceived self-efficacy in emotion regulation facilitates various aspects of psychosocial adjustment. The Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy scale (RESE) by Caprara and Gerbino (2001) measures perceived capabilities to express positive emotions (POS) and to manage negative emotions, namely, despondency/distress (DES) and anger/irritation (ANG). The present research investigated the validity of the RESE scale in Germany. Study 1 investigated the factor structure and convergent validity of the scale in a sample of university students. In order to test the generalizability of findings from Study 1, in Study 2 we studied the factor structure, cross-gender invariance, and convergent validity of a slightly revised version of the scale in a sample of parents. The previously found factor structure was successfully replicated in both samples. Partial invariance on the scalar level was confirmed across gender. All self-efficacy subscales were positively correlated with life satisfaction and with reappraisal (a cognitive emotion regulation strategy). Suppression, a strategy of regulating emotional expression, was negatively related to POS. Findings suggest that the RESE scale is a valid instrument to assess emotion regulation self-efficacy in German-speaking samples.

Self-Efficacy in Regulating Positive and Negative Emotions A Validation Study in Germany / Catherine, Gunzenhauser; Tobias, Heikamp; Gerbino, Maria; Alessandri, Guido; Antje Von, Suchodoletz; DI GIUNTA, Laura; Caprara, Gian Vittorio; Gisela, Trommsdorff. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT. - ISSN 1015-5759. - STAMPA. - 29:3(2013), pp. 197-204. [10.1027/1015-5759/a000151]

Self-Efficacy in Regulating Positive and Negative Emotions A Validation Study in Germany

GERBINO, Maria;ALESSANDRI, GUIDO;DI GIUNTA, Laura;CAPRARA, Gian Vittorio;
2013

Abstract

Perceived self-efficacy in emotion regulation facilitates various aspects of psychosocial adjustment. The Regulatory Emotional Self-Efficacy scale (RESE) by Caprara and Gerbino (2001) measures perceived capabilities to express positive emotions (POS) and to manage negative emotions, namely, despondency/distress (DES) and anger/irritation (ANG). The present research investigated the validity of the RESE scale in Germany. Study 1 investigated the factor structure and convergent validity of the scale in a sample of university students. In order to test the generalizability of findings from Study 1, in Study 2 we studied the factor structure, cross-gender invariance, and convergent validity of a slightly revised version of the scale in a sample of parents. The previously found factor structure was successfully replicated in both samples. Partial invariance on the scalar level was confirmed across gender. All self-efficacy subscales were positively correlated with life satisfaction and with reappraisal (a cognitive emotion regulation strategy). Suppression, a strategy of regulating emotional expression, was negatively related to POS. Findings suggest that the RESE scale is a valid instrument to assess emotion regulation self-efficacy in German-speaking samples.
2013
self-efficacy beliefs; emotion regulation; measurement invariance
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Self-Efficacy in Regulating Positive and Negative Emotions A Validation Study in Germany / Catherine, Gunzenhauser; Tobias, Heikamp; Gerbino, Maria; Alessandri, Guido; Antje Von, Suchodoletz; DI GIUNTA, Laura; Caprara, Gian Vittorio; Gisela, Trommsdorff. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT. - ISSN 1015-5759. - STAMPA. - 29:3(2013), pp. 197-204. [10.1027/1015-5759/a000151]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/443257
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 38
social impact