Background: Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce ischemic complications in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) who undergo invasive procedures. However the optimal timing of therapy (upstream - at hospital admission in all patients prior to coronary catheterization, or downstream - after coronary angiography selectively in patients prior to percutaneous coronary intervention) is still debated. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcome of NSTEACS patients randomized to routine upstream versus deferred selective downstream GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Methods: We scanned the literature from January 1990 to May 2009 to identify all randomized trials comparing upstream administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors versus its downstream use in invasively managed NSTEACS. Results: In 5 randomized trials a total of 9753 patients were randomized to upstream GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors therapy versus 9716 patients randomized to deferred selective downstream therapy. Upstream therapy was associated with reduced in-hospital or 30-day major adverse ischemic cardiac events (odds ratio= 0.90 [95% confidence interval 0.82-0.98], p=0.02). However the risk of major bleeding was significantly higher with upstream therapy (odds ratio=1.35 [1.11-1.63], p=0.002). Combining ischemic and hemorrhagic events in a net clinical end-point showed no significant differences between the two approaches (odds ratio=1.01 [0.92-1.10], p=0.88). Conclusions: In conclusion early administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in NSTEACS is associated with significant reduction in ischemic events compared to a selective deferred therapy after coronary angiography. However upstream therapy is also associated with increased bleeding complications. This approach should therefore be reserved for patients at high ischemic and/or low hemorrhagic risk. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Routine upstream versus selective downstream administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A meta-analysis of randomized trials / Alessandro, Sciahbasi; BIONDI ZOCCAI, Giuseppe; Enrico, Romagnoli; Marco, Valgimigli; Saman, Rasoul; Arnoud Van'T, Hof; Ernesto, Lioy; Gregg W., Stone. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0167-5273. - 155:2(2012), pp. 243-248. [10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.010]

Routine upstream versus selective downstream administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

BIONDI ZOCCAI, GIUSEPPE;
2012

Abstract

Background: Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce ischemic complications in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) who undergo invasive procedures. However the optimal timing of therapy (upstream - at hospital admission in all patients prior to coronary catheterization, or downstream - after coronary angiography selectively in patients prior to percutaneous coronary intervention) is still debated. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the outcome of NSTEACS patients randomized to routine upstream versus deferred selective downstream GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Methods: We scanned the literature from January 1990 to May 2009 to identify all randomized trials comparing upstream administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors versus its downstream use in invasively managed NSTEACS. Results: In 5 randomized trials a total of 9753 patients were randomized to upstream GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors therapy versus 9716 patients randomized to deferred selective downstream therapy. Upstream therapy was associated with reduced in-hospital or 30-day major adverse ischemic cardiac events (odds ratio= 0.90 [95% confidence interval 0.82-0.98], p=0.02). However the risk of major bleeding was significantly higher with upstream therapy (odds ratio=1.35 [1.11-1.63], p=0.002). Combining ischemic and hemorrhagic events in a net clinical end-point showed no significant differences between the two approaches (odds ratio=1.01 [0.92-1.10], p=0.88). Conclusions: In conclusion early administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in NSTEACS is associated with significant reduction in ischemic events compared to a selective deferred therapy after coronary angiography. However upstream therapy is also associated with increased bleeding complications. This approach should therefore be reserved for patients at high ischemic and/or low hemorrhagic risk. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
2012
acute coronary syndromes; glycoprotein iib/iiia inhibitors; meta-analysis; upstream
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Routine upstream versus selective downstream administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A meta-analysis of randomized trials / Alessandro, Sciahbasi; BIONDI ZOCCAI, Giuseppe; Enrico, Romagnoli; Marco, Valgimigli; Saman, Rasoul; Arnoud Van'T, Hof; Ernesto, Lioy; Gregg W., Stone. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 0167-5273. - 155:2(2012), pp. 243-248. [10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.010]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/434137
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact