Percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains a challenge for interventional cardiology, both for technical aspects and long-term clinical results. Albeit coronary bifurcation encompasses 15-20% of all lesions treated in the cardiology laboratory, and their treatment has improved due to continuous progress in techniques and materials, such lesions are still related to a higher incidence of periprocedural complications, need for reinterventions, stent thrombosis, and adverse clinical events. In this context, drug-eluting stent introduction has reduced the incidence of restenosis compared to traditional bare-metal stents but it has not modified strategic modalities of treatment. Indeed, the incidence of restenosis at the ostium of the side branch still remains high regardless of the technique used (single or double stent strategy). Therefore, provisional stenting technique still remains the preferred treatment strategy in most cases. The introduction of dedicated stents, which have been designed to reduce most technical difficulties of treating such lesions, did not translate into an improvement in the long-term clinical results. In this review, we will summarize the anatomical characteristics of coronary bifurcations and the technical difficulties related to their treatment with the aim at discussing the best strategic approach.

[Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions] / E., Romagnoli; F., Clementi; BIONDI ZOCCAI, Giuseppe; G. M., Sangiorgi. - In: GIORNALE ITALIANO DI CARDIOLOGIA. - ISSN 1827-6806. - 9:10(2008).

[Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions].

BIONDI ZOCCAI, GIUSEPPE;
2008

Abstract

Percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions remains a challenge for interventional cardiology, both for technical aspects and long-term clinical results. Albeit coronary bifurcation encompasses 15-20% of all lesions treated in the cardiology laboratory, and their treatment has improved due to continuous progress in techniques and materials, such lesions are still related to a higher incidence of periprocedural complications, need for reinterventions, stent thrombosis, and adverse clinical events. In this context, drug-eluting stent introduction has reduced the incidence of restenosis compared to traditional bare-metal stents but it has not modified strategic modalities of treatment. Indeed, the incidence of restenosis at the ostium of the side branch still remains high regardless of the technique used (single or double stent strategy). Therefore, provisional stenting technique still remains the preferred treatment strategy in most cases. The introduction of dedicated stents, which have been designed to reduce most technical difficulties of treating such lesions, did not translate into an improvement in the long-term clinical results. In this review, we will summarize the anatomical characteristics of coronary bifurcations and the technical difficulties related to their treatment with the aim at discussing the best strategic approach.
2008
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
[Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions] / E., Romagnoli; F., Clementi; BIONDI ZOCCAI, Giuseppe; G. M., Sangiorgi. - In: GIORNALE ITALIANO DI CARDIOLOGIA. - ISSN 1827-6806. - 9:10(2008).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/434106
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact