Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of an Italian version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer, 2004). Method Three studies were completed. First, factorial structure, internal consistency, and concurrent validity of our Italian version of the DERS were examined with a sample of 323 students (77% female; mean age 25.6). Second, test-retest analyses were completed using a different sample of 61 students (80% female; mean age 24.7). Third, the scores produced by a small clinical sample of participants (N = 38; mean age = 24.2) affected by anorexia, binge eating disorder, or bulimia were compared to those of an age-matched, nonclinical female sample (N = 38; mean age = 24.7). Results The factorial structure replicated quite well the six-factor structure proposed by Gratz and Roemer. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were adequate and comparable to previous findings. The validity was good, as indicated by both the concurrent validity analysis and the clinical-nonclinical sample comparison. Conclusions These studies provide further support for the multidimensional model of emotion regulation postulated by Gratz and Roemer and strengthen the rationale for cross-cultural utilization of the DERS. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Clin. Psychol. 00:1-20, 2012.

Cultural Adaptation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: Reliability and Validity of a Italian Version / Giromini, L.; Velotti, P.; DE CAMPORA, Gaia; Bonalume, L.; Zavattini, Giulio Cesare. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 0021-9762. - ELETTRONICO. - (2012), pp. 1-20. [10.1002/jclp.21876]

Cultural Adaptation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: Reliability and Validity of a Italian Version

Velotti P.;DE CAMPORA, GAIA;ZAVATTINI, Giulio Cesare
2012

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of an Italian version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer, 2004). Method Three studies were completed. First, factorial structure, internal consistency, and concurrent validity of our Italian version of the DERS were examined with a sample of 323 students (77% female; mean age 25.6). Second, test-retest analyses were completed using a different sample of 61 students (80% female; mean age 24.7). Third, the scores produced by a small clinical sample of participants (N = 38; mean age = 24.2) affected by anorexia, binge eating disorder, or bulimia were compared to those of an age-matched, nonclinical female sample (N = 38; mean age = 24.7). Results The factorial structure replicated quite well the six-factor structure proposed by Gratz and Roemer. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were adequate and comparable to previous findings. The validity was good, as indicated by both the concurrent validity analysis and the clinical-nonclinical sample comparison. Conclusions These studies provide further support for the multidimensional model of emotion regulation postulated by Gratz and Roemer and strengthen the rationale for cross-cultural utilization of the DERS. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Clin. Psychol. 00:1-20, 2012.
2012
Emotion Regulation; Eating Disorders; Validity; Reliability; DERS
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Cultural Adaptation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: Reliability and Validity of a Italian Version / Giromini, L.; Velotti, P.; DE CAMPORA, Gaia; Bonalume, L.; Zavattini, Giulio Cesare. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 0021-9762. - ELETTRONICO. - (2012), pp. 1-20. [10.1002/jclp.21876]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/431600
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 40
  • Scopus 241
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 215
social impact