At Asiacrypt 2006, Cao presented a putative framing 'attack' against the ACJT group signature scheme by Ateniese et al. This paper shows that the attack framework considered by Cao is invalid. As we clearly illustrate, there is no security weakness in the ACJT group signature scheme as long as all the detailed specifications of the original paper are being followed. Copyright © 2009 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
Remarks on "analysis of one popular group signature scheme" in Asiacrypt 2006 / Ateniese, Giuseppe; Camenisch, Jan; Marc, Joye; Gene, Tsudik. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED CRYPTOGRAPHY. - ISSN 1753-0563. - 1:4(2009), pp. 320-322. [10.1504/ijact.2009.028030]
Remarks on "analysis of one popular group signature scheme" in Asiacrypt 2006
ATENIESE, GIUSEPPE;
2009
Abstract
At Asiacrypt 2006, Cao presented a putative framing 'attack' against the ACJT group signature scheme by Ateniese et al. This paper shows that the attack framework considered by Cao is invalid. As we clearly illustrate, there is no security weakness in the ACJT group signature scheme as long as all the detailed specifications of the original paper are being followed. Copyright © 2009 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
