OBJECTIVES: To validate the modified Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) short-forms (MNA-SFs) with respect to agreement with full MNA classification in the target populations of the MNA. DESIGN: Prospective analysis. SETTING: Community, nursing home, rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred fifty-seven individuals aged 65 and older (75.3% female; mean age 82.3 +/- 7.4). MEASUREMENTS: Classification agreement between full MNA score and MNA-SF scores. RESULTS: Agreement between the full MNA and classification using the MNA-SFs was 84.6% when the MNA-SF using body mass index (BMI) was applied and 81.4% when the MNA-SF using calf circumference (CC) was applied. The highest agreement of classification was found in the community setting (90.8% and 90.4%, respectively) and the lowest in the rehabilitation setting (72.4% and 71.4%, respectively). Both MNA-SFs tended to underestimate nutritional status, but that was significant only for the MNA-SF with CC. CONCLUSION: The modified MNA-SFs represent a valuable tool for rapid and reliable nutritional screening. J Am Geriatr Soc 59:2124-2128, 2011.

Prospective Validation of the Modified Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Forms in the Community, Nursing Home, and Rehabilitation Setting / Matthias J., Kaiser; Jurgen M., Bauer; Wolfgang, Uter; Donini, Lorenzo Maria; Inken, Stange; Dorothee, Volkert; Rebecca, Diekmann; Michael, Drey; Julia, Bollwein; Settimio, Tempera; Alessandro, Guerra; Laura M., Ricciardi; Cornel C., Sieber. - In: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY. - ISSN 0002-8614. - STAMPA. - 59:11(2011), pp. 2124-2128. [10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03659.x]

Prospective Validation of the Modified Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Forms in the Community, Nursing Home, and Rehabilitation Setting

DONINI, Lorenzo Maria;
2011

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To validate the modified Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) short-forms (MNA-SFs) with respect to agreement with full MNA classification in the target populations of the MNA. DESIGN: Prospective analysis. SETTING: Community, nursing home, rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred fifty-seven individuals aged 65 and older (75.3% female; mean age 82.3 +/- 7.4). MEASUREMENTS: Classification agreement between full MNA score and MNA-SF scores. RESULTS: Agreement between the full MNA and classification using the MNA-SFs was 84.6% when the MNA-SF using body mass index (BMI) was applied and 81.4% when the MNA-SF using calf circumference (CC) was applied. The highest agreement of classification was found in the community setting (90.8% and 90.4%, respectively) and the lowest in the rehabilitation setting (72.4% and 71.4%, respectively). Both MNA-SFs tended to underestimate nutritional status, but that was significant only for the MNA-SF with CC. CONCLUSION: The modified MNA-SFs represent a valuable tool for rapid and reliable nutritional screening. J Am Geriatr Soc 59:2124-2128, 2011.
2011
nutrition screening; mini nutritional assessment; mna malnutrition elderly; older people; malnutrition
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Prospective Validation of the Modified Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Forms in the Community, Nursing Home, and Rehabilitation Setting / Matthias J., Kaiser; Jurgen M., Bauer; Wolfgang, Uter; Donini, Lorenzo Maria; Inken, Stange; Dorothee, Volkert; Rebecca, Diekmann; Michael, Drey; Julia, Bollwein; Settimio, Tempera; Alessandro, Guerra; Laura M., Ricciardi; Cornel C., Sieber. - In: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY. - ISSN 0002-8614. - STAMPA. - 59:11(2011), pp. 2124-2128. [10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03659.x]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/429215
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 98
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 94
social impact