In previous studies the repeated administration of 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg of amphetamine i.v. failed to induce psychomotor sensitization if the drug was administered to animals living in the test environment (at home). The same doses did induce sensitization if animals were transported to the test environment for each drug treatment. The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the extent to which this effect of environment is dose dependent. Rats either lived in test cages or were transported from the animal colony to test cages where they received an i.v. infusion of one of five doses of amphetamine (0.125, 0.5, 1.0, 4.0 or 8.0 mg/kg) or saline each day for 5 consecutive days. Rotational behavior was used as an index of psychomotor activation. After a 6-day drug-free period all animals were challenged with 0.5 mg/kg of amphetamine to determine the pretreatment dose necessary to induce sensitization. The effect of the drug-treatment environment was to shift the dose-effect curve for the induction of sensitization, such that significantly lower doses were necessary to induce sensitization when amphetamine was given in a novel environment. With high doses, however, sensitization occurred regardless of environmental condition. It is concluded that the circumstances surrounding drug administration can powerfully modulate the ability of psychostimulants to induce sensitization, but this effect is dose dependent.

Modulatory effect of environmental stimuli on the susceptibility to amphetamine sensitization: A dose-effect study in rats / K. E., Browman; Badiani, Aldo; T. E., Robinson. - In: THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS. - ISSN 0022-3565. - STAMPA. - 287:3(1998), pp. 1007-1014.

Modulatory effect of environmental stimuli on the susceptibility to amphetamine sensitization: A dose-effect study in rats

BADIANI, Aldo;
1998

Abstract

In previous studies the repeated administration of 0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg of amphetamine i.v. failed to induce psychomotor sensitization if the drug was administered to animals living in the test environment (at home). The same doses did induce sensitization if animals were transported to the test environment for each drug treatment. The purpose of the present experiment was to determine the extent to which this effect of environment is dose dependent. Rats either lived in test cages or were transported from the animal colony to test cages where they received an i.v. infusion of one of five doses of amphetamine (0.125, 0.5, 1.0, 4.0 or 8.0 mg/kg) or saline each day for 5 consecutive days. Rotational behavior was used as an index of psychomotor activation. After a 6-day drug-free period all animals were challenged with 0.5 mg/kg of amphetamine to determine the pretreatment dose necessary to induce sensitization. The effect of the drug-treatment environment was to shift the dose-effect curve for the induction of sensitization, such that significantly lower doses were necessary to induce sensitization when amphetamine was given in a novel environment. With high doses, however, sensitization occurred regardless of environmental condition. It is concluded that the circumstances surrounding drug administration can powerfully modulate the ability of psychostimulants to induce sensitization, but this effect is dose dependent.
1998
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Modulatory effect of environmental stimuli on the susceptibility to amphetamine sensitization: A dose-effect study in rats / K. E., Browman; Badiani, Aldo; T. E., Robinson. - In: THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS. - ISSN 0022-3565. - STAMPA. - 287:3(1998), pp. 1007-1014.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/41462
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 17
  • Scopus 71
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 68
social impact