BACKGROUND: Bowel preparation is critical for the efficacy and safety of colonoscopy. Poor patient tolerance to bowel preparation has been associated with the high amount of fluid administered. A 2-liter polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution containing ascorbic acid has been recently developed. AIMS: To compare the efficacy, safety and acceptability of 2-liter PEG + ascorbic acid vs 4- liter PEG for colonoscopy. METHODS: We designed a single blind randomized non-inferiority study in order to compare the two bowel preparation. A blinded assessment of cleansing was made by the endoscopist according to the Aronchick scale. Acceptability was assessed by questionnaire. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis were reported. RESULTS: Overall, 169 patients (PP: 166) were selected for the 2-liter PEG + ascorbic acid and 170 (PP: 166) for the 4-liter PEG. When rating global bowel cleansing at ITT, an excellent-good level was reported in 84.6% (PP: 86.2%) of patients who received 2-liter PEG + ascorbic acid and 75.3% (PP: 77%) of patients who received 4-liter PEG (p= 0.04). Acceptability rate favoured 2-Liter PEG + ascorbic acid vs 4-Liter PEG (83% vs 76%; p= 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: 2-liter PEG + ascorbic acid, completed with an additional liter of clear fluids, provided a bowel cleansing appeared to be more effective and acceptable than 4-Liter PEG.

A randomized controlled trial evaluating a new 2-liter PEG solution plus ascorbic acid versus 4-liter PEG for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy / Flavio, Valiante; Pontone, Stefano; Cesare, Hassan; Angelo, Bellumat; Manuela De, Bona; Angelo, Zullo; Michele De, Boni. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - STAMPA. - (2012), pp. 224-227. [10.1016/j.dld.2011.10.007]

A randomized controlled trial evaluating a new 2-liter PEG solution plus ascorbic acid versus 4-liter PEG for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy.

PONTONE, Stefano;
2012

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bowel preparation is critical for the efficacy and safety of colonoscopy. Poor patient tolerance to bowel preparation has been associated with the high amount of fluid administered. A 2-liter polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution containing ascorbic acid has been recently developed. AIMS: To compare the efficacy, safety and acceptability of 2-liter PEG + ascorbic acid vs 4- liter PEG for colonoscopy. METHODS: We designed a single blind randomized non-inferiority study in order to compare the two bowel preparation. A blinded assessment of cleansing was made by the endoscopist according to the Aronchick scale. Acceptability was assessed by questionnaire. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis were reported. RESULTS: Overall, 169 patients (PP: 166) were selected for the 2-liter PEG + ascorbic acid and 170 (PP: 166) for the 4-liter PEG. When rating global bowel cleansing at ITT, an excellent-good level was reported in 84.6% (PP: 86.2%) of patients who received 2-liter PEG + ascorbic acid and 75.3% (PP: 77%) of patients who received 4-liter PEG (p= 0.04). Acceptability rate favoured 2-Liter PEG + ascorbic acid vs 4-Liter PEG (83% vs 76%; p= 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: 2-liter PEG + ascorbic acid, completed with an additional liter of clear fluids, provided a bowel cleansing appeared to be more effective and acceptable than 4-Liter PEG.
2012
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
A randomized controlled trial evaluating a new 2-liter PEG solution plus ascorbic acid versus 4-liter PEG for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy / Flavio, Valiante; Pontone, Stefano; Cesare, Hassan; Angelo, Bellumat; Manuela De, Bona; Angelo, Zullo; Michele De, Boni. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - STAMPA. - (2012), pp. 224-227. [10.1016/j.dld.2011.10.007]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/411426
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 44
social impact