This paper describes the development of the protocol for the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS)-sponsored Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods, including background on the methods and chemicals selected, as well as details concerning the conduct of the collaborative study, including proficiency testing, rangefinding and main study. Participating laboratories in the collaborative study received training in the conduct and scoring of the behavioral tests and each laboratory received a Video training film to train additional personnel as needed. Each of the eight laboratories that chose to participate in the study completed proficiency testing and assessed seven representative chemicals using a functional observational battery and automated motor activity assessment. The seven chemicals studied were acrylamide, bis-acrylamide, p,p'-DDT, lead acetate, parathion, toluene, and triethyl tin. Participants received coded samples of the chemicals from a common source. Each laboratory derived doses for single and repealed administration based on the determination of a within-laboratory acute "top dose." Animal strains were not standardized and laboratory conditions were standardized to a limited degree in order to judge the general utility and robustness of these procedures in a diversity of testing situations. (C) 1997 Intox Press, Inc.

The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: II. Protocol design and testing procedures / V. C., Moser; H. A., Tilson; R. C., Macphail; G. C., Becking; Cuomo, Vincenzo; E., Frantik; B. M., Kulig; G., Winneke. - In: NEUROTOXICOLOGY. - ISSN 0161-813X. - STAMPA. - 18:4(1997), pp. 929-938.

The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: II. Protocol design and testing procedures

CUOMO, VINCENZO;
1997

Abstract

This paper describes the development of the protocol for the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS)-sponsored Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods, including background on the methods and chemicals selected, as well as details concerning the conduct of the collaborative study, including proficiency testing, rangefinding and main study. Participating laboratories in the collaborative study received training in the conduct and scoring of the behavioral tests and each laboratory received a Video training film to train additional personnel as needed. Each of the eight laboratories that chose to participate in the study completed proficiency testing and assessed seven representative chemicals using a functional observational battery and automated motor activity assessment. The seven chemicals studied were acrylamide, bis-acrylamide, p,p'-DDT, lead acetate, parathion, toluene, and triethyl tin. Participants received coded samples of the chemicals from a common source. Each laboratory derived doses for single and repealed administration based on the determination of a within-laboratory acute "top dose." Animal strains were not standardized and laboratory conditions were standardized to a limited degree in order to judge the general utility and robustness of these procedures in a diversity of testing situations. (C) 1997 Intox Press, Inc.
1997
collaborative study; functional observational battery; motor activity; neurotoxicity screening; rats
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The IPCS Collaborative Study on Neurobehavioral Screening Methods: II. Protocol design and testing procedures / V. C., Moser; H. A., Tilson; R. C., Macphail; G. C., Becking; Cuomo, Vincenzo; E., Frantik; B. M., Kulig; G., Winneke. - In: NEUROTOXICOLOGY. - ISSN 0161-813X. - STAMPA. - 18:4(1997), pp. 929-938.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/40724
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 80
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 75
social impact