Estimates of the level of invasion for a region are traditionally based on relative numbers of native and alien species. However, alien species differ dramatically in the size of their invasive ranges. Here we present the first study to quantify the level of invasion for several regions of the world in terms of the most widely distributed plant species (natives vs. aliens). Aliens accounted for 51.3% of the 120 most widely distributed plant species in North America, 43.3% in New South Wales (Australia), 34.2% in Chile, 29.7% in Argentina, and 22.5% in the Republic of South Africa. However, Europe had only 1% of alien species among the most widespread species of the flora. Across regions, alien species relative to native species were either as well-distributed (10 comparisons) or more widely distributed (5 comparisons). These striking patterns highlight the profound contribution that widespread invasive alien plants make to floristic dominance patterns across different regions. Many of the most widespread species are alien plants, and, in particular, Europe and Asia appear as major contributors to the homogenization of the floras in the Americas. We recommend that spatial extent of invasion should be explicitly incorporated in assessments of invasibility, globalization, and risk assessments.

Widespread plant species: natives versus aliens in our changing world / Thomas J., Stohlgren; Petr, Pysek; John, Kartesz; Misako, Nishino; Anibal, Pauchard; Marten, Winter; Joan, Pino; David M., Richardson; John R. u., Wilson; Brad R., Murray; Megan L., Phillips; Li Ming, Yang; Celesti, Laura; Xavier, Font. - In: BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS. - ISSN 1387-3547. - STAMPA. - 13:9(2011), pp. 1931-1944. [10.1007/s10530-011-0024-9]

Widespread plant species: natives versus aliens in our changing world

CELESTI, Laura;
2011

Abstract

Estimates of the level of invasion for a region are traditionally based on relative numbers of native and alien species. However, alien species differ dramatically in the size of their invasive ranges. Here we present the first study to quantify the level of invasion for several regions of the world in terms of the most widely distributed plant species (natives vs. aliens). Aliens accounted for 51.3% of the 120 most widely distributed plant species in North America, 43.3% in New South Wales (Australia), 34.2% in Chile, 29.7% in Argentina, and 22.5% in the Republic of South Africa. However, Europe had only 1% of alien species among the most widespread species of the flora. Across regions, alien species relative to native species were either as well-distributed (10 comparisons) or more widely distributed (5 comparisons). These striking patterns highlight the profound contribution that widespread invasive alien plants make to floristic dominance patterns across different regions. Many of the most widespread species are alien plants, and, in particular, Europe and Asia appear as major contributors to the homogenization of the floras in the Americas. We recommend that spatial extent of invasion should be explicitly incorporated in assessments of invasibility, globalization, and risk assessments.
2011
alien plants; biotic homogenization; china; europe; globalization; north america; plant invasions; south africa; south america; species distributions
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Widespread plant species: natives versus aliens in our changing world / Thomas J., Stohlgren; Petr, Pysek; John, Kartesz; Misako, Nishino; Anibal, Pauchard; Marten, Winter; Joan, Pino; David M., Richardson; John R. u., Wilson; Brad R., Murray; Megan L., Phillips; Li Ming, Yang; Celesti, Laura; Xavier, Font. - In: BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS. - ISSN 1387-3547. - STAMPA. - 13:9(2011), pp. 1931-1944. [10.1007/s10530-011-0024-9]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/393294
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 68
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact