Purpose: To determine the optimal 64-multidetector-row computed tomography scan delay from bolus-tracking trigger for the arterial phase and the evaluation of vascularization in healthy liver. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty patients are randomized into 3 groups according to scan delay (5-, 10-, 15-second arterial phase) and underwent CT of the liver. Images were evaluated on the basis of quantitative and qualitative scores. A correlation analysis between them was managed to find the most effective scan delay for best radiologists' diagnostically performances. Results: Scanning too early results in images that are acquired before the vascular peak enhancement while scanning to late results in the increasing of liver parenchyma portal feeding. Good performances were obtained with a scan delay ranging between 10 and 19 seconds from the trigger. Conclusions: When a 64-multidetector-row computed tomography with a bolus-tracking program is used, only 1 arterial phase should be acquired, setting a scan delay of 10 to 19 seconds.

Sixty-Four-Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Angiography With Bolus Tracking to Time Arterial-Phase Imaging in Healthy Liver: Is There a Correlation Between Quantitative and Qualitative Scores? / Osimani, Marcello; Rengo, Marco; Paolantonio, Pasquale; Ferrari, Riccardo; DE CECCO, CARLO NICOLA; Bellini, Davide; Maceroni, MARCO MARIA; Laghi, Andrea. - In: JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY. - ISSN 0363-8715. - STAMPA. - 34:6(2010), pp. 883-891. [10.1097/rct.0b013e3181dd80c8]

Sixty-Four-Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Angiography With Bolus Tracking to Time Arterial-Phase Imaging in Healthy Liver: Is There a Correlation Between Quantitative and Qualitative Scores?

OSIMANI, MARCELLO;RENGO, MARCO;PAOLANTONIO, PASQUALE;FERRARI, Riccardo;DE CECCO, CARLO NICOLA;BELLINI, DAVIDE;MACERONI, MARCO MARIA;LAGHI, ANDREA
2010

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the optimal 64-multidetector-row computed tomography scan delay from bolus-tracking trigger for the arterial phase and the evaluation of vascularization in healthy liver. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty patients are randomized into 3 groups according to scan delay (5-, 10-, 15-second arterial phase) and underwent CT of the liver. Images were evaluated on the basis of quantitative and qualitative scores. A correlation analysis between them was managed to find the most effective scan delay for best radiologists' diagnostically performances. Results: Scanning too early results in images that are acquired before the vascular peak enhancement while scanning to late results in the increasing of liver parenchyma portal feeding. Good performances were obtained with a scan delay ranging between 10 and 19 seconds from the trigger. Conclusions: When a 64-multidetector-row computed tomography with a bolus-tracking program is used, only 1 arterial phase should be acquired, setting a scan delay of 10 to 19 seconds.
2010
liver 64-mdct; reference values; radiographic image enhancement; quantitative and qualitative scores; prospective studies; male; contrast media; bolus tracking; middle aged; adult; humans; liver angiography; tomography: x-ray computed; aged; arterial phase; female; radiographic image interpretation: computer-assisted; angiography; liver; analysis of variance
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Sixty-Four-Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography Angiography With Bolus Tracking to Time Arterial-Phase Imaging in Healthy Liver: Is There a Correlation Between Quantitative and Qualitative Scores? / Osimani, Marcello; Rengo, Marco; Paolantonio, Pasquale; Ferrari, Riccardo; DE CECCO, CARLO NICOLA; Bellini, Davide; Maceroni, MARCO MARIA; Laghi, Andrea. - In: JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY. - ISSN 0363-8715. - STAMPA. - 34:6(2010), pp. 883-891. [10.1097/rct.0b013e3181dd80c8]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/387044
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact