Objective: In our multicenter trial we compared the potentials of biphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and a novel tissue-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent gadoxetic acid disodium in liver lesion characterization. Methods: A total of 176 patients with 252 liver lesions were analyzed. There were 104 malignant and 148 benign lesions. High-field strength (1.0 T or 1.5 T) MR systems with T1-and T2-weighted sequences were used with and without fat suppression. After gadoxetic acid disodium injection, dynamic imaging and hepatocyte phase MR imaging were performed. Biphasic with 150 mg I/kg of body weight (100-200 mL) spiral CT was also performed. Image reading consisted of on-site (by study investigators) and fully blinded off-site (by E.S.P; C.R; and A.S) evaluations. The classification (benign or malignant) and characterization (lesion type) outcomes of both techniques were assessed. All imaging results were verified against a standard of reference. Results: Both on-site and off-site evaluations demonstrated increases in the lesion classification accuracy with gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced MRI when compared with spiral CT. This improvement was also shown for characterization. Gadoxetic acid disodium was well tolerated. Conclusions: Gadoxetic acid disodium offers a safe and diagnostically powerful tool for the evaluation of patients with focal liver lesions with a reliable assessment of lesion classification and characterization.

Liver tumor characterization: Comparison between liver-specific gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced MRI and biphasic CT - A multicenter trial / Juha, H., Josy, B., Carmen, A., Thomas, B., Marie France, B., Lennart, B., Rick, C., Luigi, G., Renate, H., Alexander, H., Gregor, J., Denis, K., Laghi, A., Edward, L., Luciano, L., Luca, M., Julio, M., E., S.P., Caroline, R., Michael, S., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY. - ISSN 0363-8715. - STAMPA. - 30:3(2006), pp. 345-354. [10.1097/00004728-200605000-00001]

Liver tumor characterization: Comparison between liver-specific gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced MRI and biphasic CT - A multicenter trial

LAGHI, ANDREA;
2006

Abstract

Objective: In our multicenter trial we compared the potentials of biphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and a novel tissue-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent gadoxetic acid disodium in liver lesion characterization. Methods: A total of 176 patients with 252 liver lesions were analyzed. There were 104 malignant and 148 benign lesions. High-field strength (1.0 T or 1.5 T) MR systems with T1-and T2-weighted sequences were used with and without fat suppression. After gadoxetic acid disodium injection, dynamic imaging and hepatocyte phase MR imaging were performed. Biphasic with 150 mg I/kg of body weight (100-200 mL) spiral CT was also performed. Image reading consisted of on-site (by study investigators) and fully blinded off-site (by E.S.P; C.R; and A.S) evaluations. The classification (benign or malignant) and characterization (lesion type) outcomes of both techniques were assessed. All imaging results were verified against a standard of reference. Results: Both on-site and off-site evaluations demonstrated increases in the lesion classification accuracy with gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced MRI when compared with spiral CT. This improvement was also shown for characterization. Gadoxetic acid disodium was well tolerated. Conclusions: Gadoxetic acid disodium offers a safe and diagnostically powerful tool for the evaluation of patients with focal liver lesions with a reliable assessment of lesion classification and characterization.
2006
liver diseases; contrast agent; gadolinium dtpa; liver magnetic resonance; liver ct; liver neoplasms; lesion; liver; magnetic resonance imaging; tomography: spiral computed; humans; magnetic resonance
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Liver tumor characterization: Comparison between liver-specific gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced MRI and biphasic CT - A multicenter trial / Juha, H., Josy, B., Carmen, A., Thomas, B., Marie France, B., Lennart, B., Rick, C., Luigi, G., Renate, H., Alexander, H., Gregor, J., Denis, K., Laghi, A., Edward, L., Luciano, L., Luca, M., Julio, M., E., S.P., Caroline, R., Michael, S., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY. - ISSN 0363-8715. - STAMPA. - 30:3(2006), pp. 345-354. [10.1097/00004728-200605000-00001]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/386996
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 49
  • Scopus 150
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 145
social impact