Background and Study Aims: Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), also known as virtual colonoscopy, is a recently introduced imaging modality for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance of CTC in a blinded comparison with conventional colonoscopy. Patients and Methods: A total of 66 consecutive, symptomatic patients underwent spiral computed tomography (CT) examination after standard bowel preparation. CT images were analyzed and subsequently compared with conventional colonoscopy findings. Results: Conventional colonoscopy detected 15 colorectal carcinomas and 52 polyps. CTC correctly identified all carcinomas, 13 of 14 polyps greater than 10.0 mm (sensitivity 92.8%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI); 77-100), 11 of 13 polyps between 6.0 and 9.0 mm (sensitivity 84.6%; 95% Cl; 62-100), and six of 25 polyps smaller than 5.0 mm (sensitivity 24%; 95% Cl; 6-42). The per-patient sensitivity and specificity were 93.7% and 94.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Computed tomographic colonography is an accurate imaging modality for the detection of colorectal neoplasia, especially for lesions larger than 6.0 mm in diameter.

Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): Blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia / Laghi, Andrea; R., Iannaccone; Carbone, Iacopo; Catalano, Carlo; Panebianco, Valeria; DI GIULIO, Emilio; Schillaci, Alberto; Passariello, Roberto. - In: ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0013-726X. - STAMPA. - 34:6(2002), pp. 441-446. [10.1055/s-2002-31999]

Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): Blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia

LAGHI, ANDREA;CARBONE, IACOPO;CATALANO, Carlo;PANEBIANCO, VALERIA;DI GIULIO, Emilio;SCHILLACI, Alberto;PASSARIELLO, Roberto
2002

Abstract

Background and Study Aims: Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), also known as virtual colonoscopy, is a recently introduced imaging modality for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance of CTC in a blinded comparison with conventional colonoscopy. Patients and Methods: A total of 66 consecutive, symptomatic patients underwent spiral computed tomography (CT) examination after standard bowel preparation. CT images were analyzed and subsequently compared with conventional colonoscopy findings. Results: Conventional colonoscopy detected 15 colorectal carcinomas and 52 polyps. CTC correctly identified all carcinomas, 13 of 14 polyps greater than 10.0 mm (sensitivity 92.8%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI); 77-100), 11 of 13 polyps between 6.0 and 9.0 mm (sensitivity 84.6%; 95% Cl; 62-100), and six of 25 polyps smaller than 5.0 mm (sensitivity 24%; 95% Cl; 6-42). The per-patient sensitivity and specificity were 93.7% and 94.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Computed tomographic colonography is an accurate imaging modality for the detection of colorectal neoplasia, especially for lesions larger than 6.0 mm in diameter.
2002
adult; aged; aged: 80 and over; algorithms; colonography: computed tomographic; colonoscopy; colorectal neoplasms; diagnosis: differential; evaluation studies as topic; female; humans; male; middle aged; predictive value of tests; prospective studies; sensitivity and specificity; single-blind method
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): Blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia / Laghi, Andrea; R., Iannaccone; Carbone, Iacopo; Catalano, Carlo; Panebianco, Valeria; DI GIULIO, Emilio; Schillaci, Alberto; Passariello, Roberto. - In: ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0013-726X. - STAMPA. - 34:6(2002), pp. 441-446. [10.1055/s-2002-31999]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/386735
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 52
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 43
social impact