Solid reactive mixtures were tested as filling material for the development of biological permeable reactive barriers for the treatment of heavy metals contaminated waters. Mixture selection was performed by taking into account the different mechanisms operating in sulphate and cadmium removal with particular attention to bioprecipitation and sorption onto the organic matrices in the mixtures. Suspensions of eight reactive mixtures were tested for sulphate removal (initial concentration 3 g L-1). Each mixture was made up of four main functional components: a mix of organic sources for bacterial growth, a neutralizing agent, a porous medium and zero-valent iron. The best mixture among the tested ones (M8: 6% leaves, 9% compost, 3% zero-valent iron, 30% silica sand, 30% perlite, 22% limestone) presented optimal conditions for SRB growth (pH 7.8 ± 0.1; Eh = -410 ± 5 mV) and 83% sulphate removal in 22 days (25% due to bioreduction, 32% due to sorption onto compost and 20% onto leaves). M8 mixture allowed the complete abatement of cadmium with a significant contribution of sorption over bioprecipitation (6% Cd removal due to SRB activity). Sorption properties, characterised by potentiometric titrations and related modelling, were mainly due to carboxylic sites of organic components used in reactive mixtures. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Assessment of solid reactive mixtures for the development of biological permeable reactive barriers / Pagnanelli, Francesca; CRUZ VIGGI, Carolina; Mainelli, Sara; Toro, Luigi. - In: JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. - ISSN 0304-3894. - 170:2-3(2009), pp. 998-1005. [10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.081]

Assessment of solid reactive mixtures for the development of biological permeable reactive barriers

PAGNANELLI, Francesca;CRUZ VIGGI, CAROLINA;MAINELLI, SARA;TORO, Luigi
2009

Abstract

Solid reactive mixtures were tested as filling material for the development of biological permeable reactive barriers for the treatment of heavy metals contaminated waters. Mixture selection was performed by taking into account the different mechanisms operating in sulphate and cadmium removal with particular attention to bioprecipitation and sorption onto the organic matrices in the mixtures. Suspensions of eight reactive mixtures were tested for sulphate removal (initial concentration 3 g L-1). Each mixture was made up of four main functional components: a mix of organic sources for bacterial growth, a neutralizing agent, a porous medium and zero-valent iron. The best mixture among the tested ones (M8: 6% leaves, 9% compost, 3% zero-valent iron, 30% silica sand, 30% perlite, 22% limestone) presented optimal conditions for SRB growth (pH 7.8 ± 0.1; Eh = -410 ± 5 mV) and 83% sulphate removal in 22 days (25% due to bioreduction, 32% due to sorption onto compost and 20% onto leaves). M8 mixture allowed the complete abatement of cadmium with a significant contribution of sorption over bioprecipitation (6% Cd removal due to SRB activity). Sorption properties, characterised by potentiometric titrations and related modelling, were mainly due to carboxylic sites of organic components used in reactive mixtures. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
2009
batch reactor; bioprecipitation; permeable reactive barrier; sorption; sulphate-reducing bacteria
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Assessment of solid reactive mixtures for the development of biological permeable reactive barriers / Pagnanelli, Francesca; CRUZ VIGGI, Carolina; Mainelli, Sara; Toro, Luigi. - In: JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. - ISSN 0304-3894. - 170:2-3(2009), pp. 998-1005. [10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.081]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/362719
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact