Potentiometric titrations and lead sorption tests were conducted using muscovite, clinochlore, hematite, goethite, quartz, and a mixture of these same minerals. Mechanistic models were developed to represent and interpret these data. The aim was isolating the specific contribution of each mineral in proton and lead binding. Acid-base properties of each single mineral as well as their mixture were represented by discrete models, which consider the dissociation of n monoprotic sites (n-site/n-K-H models). A one-site/one-K-H model (logK(H1) = 10.69) was chosen for quartz (dissociation of SiOH edge hydroxyl groups). Goethite and hematite (FeOH groups) were represented by the same one-site/one-K-H model (logK(H1) = 10.35). Three-site/three-K-H models were used for muscovite (logK(H1) = 4.18; logK(H2) = 6.65; log K-H3 = 9.67) and clinochlore (log K-H1 = 3.84; log K-H2 = 6.57; log K-H3 = 9.71) assuming that SiOH and AlOH of the alummosilicate matrix dissociate in the acid-neutral pH range while SiOH groups of quartz inclusions dissociate in the basic range. Similarly, the mixture of these minerals was represented by a three-site/three-K-H model (log K-H1= 3.39; log K-H2 = 6.72; log K-H3 10.82). According to crossed comparisons with single minerals, the first two sites of the mixture were associated with the aluminosilicate matrix (SiOH and AlOH respectively) and the third site with iron oxides (FeOH) and quartz groups. Additivity of proton binding in the mixture was demonstrated by simulating the mixture's titration curve. A unified model for the entire set of titration curves (single minerals and mixture) was also developed introducing a three-peak distribution function for proton affinity constants. Experimental data for lead sorption onto the mixture and individual minerals in 3-5 pH range denoted the competition between protons and metallic ions. The entire set of lead isotherms (individual mineral and mixture data) was represented adequately by a unified model taking into account both monodentate and bidentate complexes with the three active sites (additivity of lead binding). Experimental data of metal distribution in solid and liquid phases were successfully simulated by implementing the protonation and the surface complexation constants into the database of a dedicated software for chemical equilibria. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Non-electrostatic surface complexation models for protons and lead(II) sorption onto single minerals and their mixture / Pagnanelli, Francesca; Lorena, Bornoroni; Moscardini, Emanuela; Toro, Luigi. - In: CHEMOSPHERE. - ISSN 0045-6535. - 63:7(2006), pp. 1063-1073. [10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.09.017]

Non-electrostatic surface complexation models for protons and lead(II) sorption onto single minerals and their mixture

PAGNANELLI, Francesca;MOSCARDINI, Emanuela;TORO, Luigi
2006

Abstract

Potentiometric titrations and lead sorption tests were conducted using muscovite, clinochlore, hematite, goethite, quartz, and a mixture of these same minerals. Mechanistic models were developed to represent and interpret these data. The aim was isolating the specific contribution of each mineral in proton and lead binding. Acid-base properties of each single mineral as well as their mixture were represented by discrete models, which consider the dissociation of n monoprotic sites (n-site/n-K-H models). A one-site/one-K-H model (logK(H1) = 10.69) was chosen for quartz (dissociation of SiOH edge hydroxyl groups). Goethite and hematite (FeOH groups) were represented by the same one-site/one-K-H model (logK(H1) = 10.35). Three-site/three-K-H models were used for muscovite (logK(H1) = 4.18; logK(H2) = 6.65; log K-H3 = 9.67) and clinochlore (log K-H1 = 3.84; log K-H2 = 6.57; log K-H3 = 9.71) assuming that SiOH and AlOH of the alummosilicate matrix dissociate in the acid-neutral pH range while SiOH groups of quartz inclusions dissociate in the basic range. Similarly, the mixture of these minerals was represented by a three-site/three-K-H model (log K-H1= 3.39; log K-H2 = 6.72; log K-H3 10.82). According to crossed comparisons with single minerals, the first two sites of the mixture were associated with the aluminosilicate matrix (SiOH and AlOH respectively) and the third site with iron oxides (FeOH) and quartz groups. Additivity of proton binding in the mixture was demonstrated by simulating the mixture's titration curve. A unified model for the entire set of titration curves (single minerals and mixture) was also developed introducing a three-peak distribution function for proton affinity constants. Experimental data for lead sorption onto the mixture and individual minerals in 3-5 pH range denoted the competition between protons and metallic ions. The entire set of lead isotherms (individual mineral and mixture data) was represented adequately by a unified model taking into account both monodentate and bidentate complexes with the three active sites (additivity of lead binding). Experimental data of metal distribution in solid and liquid phases were successfully simulated by implementing the protonation and the surface complexation constants into the database of a dedicated software for chemical equilibria. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2006
equilibrium modeling; lead; metal speciation; mineral mixture; titration
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Non-electrostatic surface complexation models for protons and lead(II) sorption onto single minerals and their mixture / Pagnanelli, Francesca; Lorena, Bornoroni; Moscardini, Emanuela; Toro, Luigi. - In: CHEMOSPHERE. - ISSN 0045-6535. - 63:7(2006), pp. 1063-1073. [10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.09.017]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/361578
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact