The main aim of this research is to compare the efficiency of biological and chemical-physical treatments for the removal of organic azo dyes in the textile wastewater. Regarding the biological reduction of the wastewater colour the anaerobic/aerobic (ANA/AER) sequential step-treatment provides the best reductions in colour and COD. A lab-scale Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) fed with synthetic wastewater and mono-azo dye (at the initial concentration of 25 mg/l) was used achieving 84% colour reduction and 82% COD removal. Chemical-physical treatments were performed using the oxidative method with Fenton's reagent and adsorption on the activated carbon achieving respectively colour reduction over 90% (from the initial concentration of 250 mg/l) and 155 mg col/g GAC total adsorption capacity (from the initial concentration of 1 g/l).
Comparison between biological and chemical-physical treatment for colour removal / Farabegoli, Geneve; L., Pietrelli; Rolle, Enrico; A., Sabene. - In: WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: WATER SUPPLY. - ISSN 1606-9749. - ELETTRONICO. - 4 (5-6):(2004), pp. 65-72.
Comparison between biological and chemical-physical treatment for colour removal.
FARABEGOLI, Geneve;ROLLE, Enrico;
2004
Abstract
The main aim of this research is to compare the efficiency of biological and chemical-physical treatments for the removal of organic azo dyes in the textile wastewater. Regarding the biological reduction of the wastewater colour the anaerobic/aerobic (ANA/AER) sequential step-treatment provides the best reductions in colour and COD. A lab-scale Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) fed with synthetic wastewater and mono-azo dye (at the initial concentration of 25 mg/l) was used achieving 84% colour reduction and 82% COD removal. Chemical-physical treatments were performed using the oxidative method with Fenton's reagent and adsorption on the activated carbon achieving respectively colour reduction over 90% (from the initial concentration of 250 mg/l) and 155 mg col/g GAC total adsorption capacity (from the initial concentration of 1 g/l).File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Farabegoli_Comparison-between-biological_2004.pdf
accesso aperto
Note: articolo
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
528.35 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
528.35 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.