We performed a gap analysis of protected area networks in Italy to assess the representatives of potential natural vegetation (PNV) types of the European Natura 2000 network compared with the National Protected Area network. In this context, the PNV map, reflecting the diversity and spatial arrangement of the natural terrestrial ecosystems, can be considered as an appropriate proxy of environmental and biogeographical diversity of Italy. In this country, 775 protected areas are registered in the Official List of Protected Areas (OLP Lambda), 2281 sites are listed as Sites of Community Interest and 590 as Special Protection Areas, constituting the Natura 2000 network. The adopted conservation target considered that any PNV type included for less than the 10% in the PAs network (OLP Lambda, Natura 2000) was defined as a gap in the system, In particular we defined as a "total gap" (i.e., under-protected); any PNV type with a representation of less than 10% in either the OLP Lambda of the N2000 was defined as a "partial gap"; any PNV type with a representation of less than 10% in either the OLP Lambda or the N2000 was defined as a "partial gap"; and PNV type with a representation of between 10 and 50% in both the OLP Lambda and N2000 was defined as "protected"; lastly, any PNV type with a representation of more than 50% in both the OLP Lambda and N2000 was defined as "widely-protected". Digital overlays of PNV and P Lambda s networks were seperately performed and statistics produced, indicating the current state of protection of Potential natural Vegetation types in the two networks (OLP Lambda and Natura 2000). We found that more than 59% of PNV types recognized on the Italian territory is not protected by the OLP Lambda network. On the contrary, regarding Natura 2000 network, 68% of PNV types are protected, accounting for 27% more than OLP Lambda. Compared to the National network of OLP Lambda, the European network Natura 2000 is characterized by a larger percentage of territory in terms of area (18% of the Italian territory for Natura 2000 vs 10% of OLP Lambda) but also by a smaller size of the sites, allowing for a more coherent distribution and efficiency in the protection of habitat remnants (68% PNV types protected by Natura 2000 vs 41% by OLP Lambda). The proposed PNV approach can help guiding decisions on where and how to spend scarce conservation management resources.

A gap analysis comparing Natura 2000 vs National Protected Area network with potential natural vegetation / Rosati, Leonardo; Marignani, Michela; Blasi, Carlo. - In: COMMUNITY ECOLOGY. - ISSN 1585-8553. - 9:2(2008), pp. 147-154. ((Intervento presentato al convegno International Conference on Monitoring the Effectiveness of Nature Conservation tenutosi a Birmensdorf, SWITZERLAND nel SEP 03-06, 2007 [10.1556/comec.9.2008.2.3].

A gap analysis comparing Natura 2000 vs National Protected Area network with potential natural vegetation

ROSATI, Leonardo;MARIGNANI, Michela;BLASI, Carlo
2008

Abstract

We performed a gap analysis of protected area networks in Italy to assess the representatives of potential natural vegetation (PNV) types of the European Natura 2000 network compared with the National Protected Area network. In this context, the PNV map, reflecting the diversity and spatial arrangement of the natural terrestrial ecosystems, can be considered as an appropriate proxy of environmental and biogeographical diversity of Italy. In this country, 775 protected areas are registered in the Official List of Protected Areas (OLP Lambda), 2281 sites are listed as Sites of Community Interest and 590 as Special Protection Areas, constituting the Natura 2000 network. The adopted conservation target considered that any PNV type included for less than the 10% in the PAs network (OLP Lambda, Natura 2000) was defined as a gap in the system, In particular we defined as a "total gap" (i.e., under-protected); any PNV type with a representation of less than 10% in either the OLP Lambda of the N2000 was defined as a "partial gap"; any PNV type with a representation of less than 10% in either the OLP Lambda or the N2000 was defined as a "partial gap"; and PNV type with a representation of between 10 and 50% in both the OLP Lambda and N2000 was defined as "protected"; lastly, any PNV type with a representation of more than 50% in both the OLP Lambda and N2000 was defined as "widely-protected". Digital overlays of PNV and P Lambda s networks were seperately performed and statistics produced, indicating the current state of protection of Potential natural Vegetation types in the two networks (OLP Lambda and Natura 2000). We found that more than 59% of PNV types recognized on the Italian territory is not protected by the OLP Lambda network. On the contrary, regarding Natura 2000 network, 68% of PNV types are protected, accounting for 27% more than OLP Lambda. Compared to the National network of OLP Lambda, the European network Natura 2000 is characterized by a larger percentage of territory in terms of area (18% of the Italian territory for Natura 2000 vs 10% of OLP Lambda) but also by a smaller size of the sites, allowing for a more coherent distribution and efficiency in the protection of habitat remnants (68% PNV types protected by Natura 2000 vs 41% by OLP Lambda). The proposed PNV approach can help guiding decisions on where and how to spend scarce conservation management resources.
International Conference on Monitoring the Effectiveness of Nature Conservation
conservation biogeography; "conservation biogeography"; "ecoregions"; natura 2000 network; "italy"; italy; ecoregions
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04c Atto di convegno in rivista
A gap analysis comparing Natura 2000 vs National Protected Area network with potential natural vegetation / Rosati, Leonardo; Marignani, Michela; Blasi, Carlo. - In: COMMUNITY ECOLOGY. - ISSN 1585-8553. - 9:2(2008), pp. 147-154. ((Intervento presentato al convegno International Conference on Monitoring the Effectiveness of Nature Conservation tenutosi a Birmensdorf, SWITZERLAND nel SEP 03-06, 2007 [10.1556/comec.9.2008.2.3].
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/359676
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 48
social impact